Much work remains to reach consensus on musculoskeletal injury risk in military service members: A systematic review with meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

Musculoskeletal injuries are the most common reason military service members cannot perform their military duties. Not only are they costly and associated with long-term disability, often long after completion of military service, but injuries also adversely affect the military readiness of a nation. This can be seen as a threat to national security and part of the impetus behind many efforts to better understand, predict, and mitigate injury risk in the military. A systematic review of the literature published between 1995 and October 31, 2020 was conducted to identify significant risk factors of musculoskeletal injury in military populations across the world. 74 out of 170 eligible studies addressed comprehensive injuries, providing 994 unique risk factors. 46 of these studies provided data that could be included in a meta-analysis, which was possible for 15 predictor variables. Seven predictors were significant in meta-analysis: female sex(RR=1.46;95CI 1.30,1.64), high body mass index(RR=1.36;95CI 1.21,1.53), functional movement screen pain (RR=1.70;95CI 1.55,1.87) or scores ≤ 14(RR=1.42 95CI 1.29,1.56), prior injury(RR=1.54;95CI 1.32,1.80), slower running performance(RR=1.33;95CI 1.18,1.51), and poorer push-up performance(RR=1.15;95CI 1.04,1.27). Low BMI, height, weight, smoking, physical activity scores, and sit-up and jump performance were not significant risk factors in the meta-analysis. Most studies had a high risk of bias. Lack of raw data and large heterogeneity in definitions of predictors and injury outcomes limited comparison across many studies.

Highlights

• Female sex, high body mass index, pain with functional movement screen or a score of ≤ 14, prior injury, slower running performance and poorer push-up performance were all significant predictors of musculoskeletal injury.

• Low body mass index, height, weight, smoking, physical activity scores, and sit-up and jump performance were not significant predictors of musculoskeletal injury.

• Many other predictors were present only in single studies, but large heterogeneity in definitions of both outcomes and predictors limited comparison across studies.

• Overall, studies assessing risk factors to predict musculoskeletal injuries in the military were at high risk for bias, especially in regards to statistical approaches.

KEYWORDS:

• Injury & prevention
• musculoskeletal
• prediction
• military

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Disclaimer

The view(s) expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official policy or position of the US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (USARIEM), the Department of the Army, Defense Health Agency, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported in part by an appointment to the Department of Defense (DOD) Research Participation Program administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the DOD. ORISE is managed by ORAU under DOE contract number DE-SC0014664.