200
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Small bowel transplant – novel indications and recent progress

, , , , &
Pages 677-690 | Received 12 Dec 2022, Accepted 24 May 2023, Published online: 05 Jun 2023
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Advances in the management of intestinal failure have led to a reduction in the number of intestinal transplants. The number of bowel transplants has been mainly stable even though a slight increase has been observed in the last 5 years.

Areas covered

Standard indication includes patients with a reasonable life expectancy. Recent progress can be deduced by the increased number of intestine transplants in adults: this is due to the continuous improvement of 1-year graft survival worldwide (without differences in 3- and 5-year) associated with better abdominal wall closure techniques. This review aims to provide an update on new indications and changes in trends of pediatric and adult intestine transplantation. This analysis, which stretches through the past 5 years, is based on a collection of related manuscripts from PubMed.

Expert commentary

Intestinal transplants should be solely intended for a group of individuals for whom indications for transplantation are clear and both medical and surgical rehabilitations have failed. Nevertheless, many protocols developed over the years have not yet solved the key question represented by the over-immunosuppression. Novel indications and recent progress in the bowel transplant field, minimal yet consistent, represent a pathway to be followed.

Article highlights

  • Intestinal transplantation should be strictly reserved to a group of individuals for whom the indications to transplant are clear and medical and surgical rehabilitations have failed.

  • Medical approaches (such as rehabilitation or in the near future proteomic therapy) and non-transplant surgical techniques have a central role in the management of patients with intestinal failure.

  • Novel criteria for intestinal transplant are recently emerged implementing new indications to transplant apart from the standard ones.

  • Quality of life itself does not represent an option for transplantation unless other indications are present.

  • The intestine is the most immunologically complex solid organ allograft with the greatest risk of both rejection and graft-versus-host disease: high levels of immunosuppression are required, increasing morbidity and mortality.

  • Tacrolimus-based regimens are the leading induction agents for immunosuppressive therapies.

Abbreviations

IF=

Intestinal failure

GI=

Gastrointestinal

PN=

Parenteral nutrition

SBS=

Short bowel syndrome

IA=

Intestinal adaptation

MSBR=

Massive small bowel resection

HPN=

Home parenteral nutrition

IFALD=

Intestinal failure associated liver disease

ITx=

Intestinal transplantation

SBL=

Small bowel length

ICV=

Ileocecal valve

QOL=

Quality of life

GF=

Growth factor

AGIR=

Autologous gastrointestinal reconstruction

IRPs=

Intestinal Rehabilitation Programs

LILT=

Longitudinal intestinal lengthening and tailoring

STEP=

Serial transverse enteroplasty

SILT=

Spiral intestinal lengthening and tailoring

IRTA=

Intestinal Rehabilitation and Transplant Association

ESPEN=

European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism

CRBS=

catheter-related bacteremia/sepsis

OPTN=

Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network

AMS=

Antibody-mediated rejection

DSAs=

Donor-specific antibodies

IS=

Immunosuppression

ACR=

Acute cellular rejection

HLA=

Human leukocyte antigen

IVIG=

Intravenous immunoglobulin

GVHD=

Graft-versus-host disease

mTOR=

Mammalian target of rapamycin

E&B=

Endoscopy and biopsy

PTLD=

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease

MvTX=

Multi-visceral transplantation

MMvTX=

Modified multivisceral transplantation

CLABSI=

Central line – associated bloodstream infection

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Ms Elena BALDISSONE for her invaluable support in English editing.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 602.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.