Abstract
Purpose
To determine the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the Powered Mobility Program (PMP) and the Israel Ministry of Health Powered Mobility Proficiency Test (PM-PT); to test inter-rater reliability of the Assessment of Learning Powered Mobility (ALP) tool; to determine the convergent validity of these measures for children with physical disabilities.
Materials and methods
Participants included 30 children (mean 10 years, 6 months [SD 3 years, 7 months]; range: 6–18 years) with cerebral palsy and other neuromuscular disorders. Participants were non-proficient powered wheelchair drivers. Two blinded raters assessed the driving ability by viewing videos of the participants twice as they drove a pre-designed route at ALYN Hospital, Israel. They were assessed via the PMP, ALP and PM-PT outcome measures. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC2,1) were used to test intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and Spearman correlation coefficients were used to assess convergent validity.
Results
The PMP intra-rater reliability revealed ICCs2,1 of coefficients were 0.97/0.98 for both raters. For the PM-PT the ICC2,1 was 0.89/0.96 for both raters. The PMP inter-rater reliability ICC2,1 was 0.94/0.87 for the two tests, for the PM-PT the ICC2,1 was 0.91/0.87 for the two tests and for the ALP the ICC2,1 was 0.83. The convergent validity between the PMP and the PM-PT was rs=0.96, between the PMP and ALP was rs=0.89 and between the PM-PT and ALP was rs=0.87.
Conclusions
The PMP and PM-PT intra and interrater reliability were good to excellent, the ALP inter-rater reliability was good and the convergent validity between all three measures was good to excellent.
There is evidence of validity and reliability for three tests of powered wheelchair proficiency (PMP, PM-PT and ALP).
Children using powered mobility, aged 6–18 years, now have outcome measures with empirical evidence that was previously lacking.
When time for assessment is limited, the shorter PM-PT can be used instead of the more comprehensive PMP.
Implications for rehabilitation
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the children and families that participated in the study. The authors thank Osnat Yaniv and Avigail Haimovski for their help in assessing the children. This study is part of a doctoral dissertation by the first author.
Disclosure statement
The authors have no conflict of interest.
Notes
1 The ICC that was used in the current study is termed by (20) as ICC2,1 and is defined as a measure that suits a situation where each subject is measured by each rater, and raters are considered representative of a larger population of similar raters. In addition, the reliability coefficient is calculated from a single measurement.