104
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Report

Electronic patient agenda forms: comparing agreement between the reason for specialty consultation reported by referring providers and patients

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 105-113 | Published online: 06 Mar 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Objective: Little is known about the agreement between referring providers’ reason for specialty evaluation and patients’ understanding of why they are referred for consultation. Here, we compared the reason for consult (RFC) documented by referring providers during usual care vs. the perceived RFC independently reported by patients through an e-portal just prior to the specialist visit. Methods: We performed an observational study among patients referred for gastrointestinal (GI) evaluation. Patients referred to the specialty clinic submitted their self-reported RFC using an online patient agenda form prior to their visit. Therefore, each participant had a referring provider- and patient-documented RFC. Blinded physicians reviewed the RFCs in random order using a priori coding criteria. We then compared whether the provider and patient RFC pairs were concordant (i.e., ≥1 clinical topic[s] in the RFCs matched). Results: Sixty patients completed the e-portal prior to their visit, leading to 60 provider-patient RFC pairs. The RFC pairs were concordant in only 52% of cases. Conclusions: There is poor agreement between referring providers’ reason for GI referral and patients’ understanding of why they are visiting the clinic. Future research examining whether electronic patient agenda forms impact diagnostic and management precision, patient satisfaction, and healthcare utilization is warranted.

Acknowledgments

This work was presented as a Poster of Distinction at Digestive Disease Week, San Diego, CA, May 21-24, 2016.

Declaration of interest

Drs. Chey and Spiegel are principals in My Total Health. Dr. Almario has a stock option grant in My Total Health. The remaining authors do not have any relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Supplemental data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by an NIH/NIAMS research grant (U01 AR057936-05). Dr. Almario was supported by a Career Development Award from the American College of Gastroenterology. The Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CS-CORE) is supported by The Marc and Sheri Rapaport Fund for Digital Health Sciences & Precision Health.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,155.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.