Constraints to the capacity of smallholder farming households to adapt to climate change in South and Southeast Asia

Abstract

Rural households in developing countries face a range of pressures to secure their livelihoods. Households feel the effects of changing rainfall patterns, droughts, cyclones, floods and increased temperatures, and draw on a wide range of resources to adapt but some households are better equipped than others. We explore the extent to which smallholder rural households might be able to adapt to the processes of increased climate variability or climate change through assessing their adaptive capacity using elements of the rural livelihoods framework. We involved almost 600 participants in discussions and interviews in India, Bangladesh, Cambodia and Lao PDR to explore the factors that condition their ability to adapt. We identified 36 key indicators of adaptive capacity, half were specifically related to climate change or climate variability, with others recognized as important in terms of overall livelihoods. “Experience”, “health” and “labour” (Human capital), “access to market” and “farmer networks/groups” (Social capital) were considered strongly enabling of adaptation, whereas “lack of training” (Human capital) and “soil quality/condition” (Natural capital) constrained adaptation. It takes time for households to recover from climatic events, but, households with better access to diverse resources, and a more balanced livelihood portfolio were better able to cope. Mechanisms to support adaptation involved supporting farmer groups, novel information networks, better access to markets and value chains, land ownership, improved financial and economic management, and credit options.

Keywords:

• Bangladesh
• Cambodia
• community
• focus group discussions
• India
• Lao PDR
• rural livelihood analysis
• self-assessment
• smallholder farmers

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the farmers that participated in this research. We sincerely thank Jahangir Kabir (Bangladesh Rice Research Institute), Himu Bain and Labonya (Socio Economic Research and Development Initiative), Dr Raji Reddy and Dr G. Sreenivas (Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University), Madhusudan Bandi, Manohar and Bala (Livelihoods and Natural Resource Management Institute), Heng Sophors, Svay Sinarong, Thaung Piseth, Bo Sokun and Tai Chandara (Cambodia Agriculture Research and Development Institute), Souphaphanh, Sian and Phoukeo (National University of Laos) and Souksadachanh (National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute, Laos) who supported/conducted the FGDs and interviews. We gratefully acknowledge the input gained from Rohan Nelson and Mark Howden in the initial development and support of this work, and from John Ward, Nadine Marshall, Toni Darbas and Russell Wise for input on an earlier draft of the manuscript. This research has been approved, and complies with the ethical research requirements of the CSIRO Social Sciences Human Research Ethics Committee #004/10.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research: [Grant Number LWR/2008/015; LWR/2008/019]; CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship.