297
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentary

A Brief Dietary Screening and Counseling Tool for Health Educators

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 111-116 | Received 22 Oct 2020, Accepted 10 Dec 2020, Published online: 15 Apr 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Diet quality assessment in community health settings is critical to reduce the incidence and improve management of diet-related chronic disease. Unfortunately, understandable and actionable brief dietary screening tools that empower individuals are nearly absent.

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to describe two rigorous methodological approaches to validate and assess suitability of the Rapid Diet Quality Screener (RDQS).

Methods: The first phase consisted of the content validation of a food consumption frequency questionnaire based on the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI). The second phase involved evaluating the design of the RDQS using the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM).

Results: The RDQS and its food/beverage consumption frequency questions met established validity criteria consistent with the AHEI dietary metric components. The SAM evaluation was superior, thus elevating the RDQS from a one-way process of users assessing their diet quality to a two-way process allowing users to engage in behavior change that positively supports health and well-being.

Translation to Health Education Practice: The RDQS enables health educators to quickly screen an individual’s diet quality to determine risk, guide brief counseling, and monitor progress with the populations they engage.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the following persons for their multiple reviews of the Rapid Diet Quality Screener: Walter Willett, M.D., Dr. P.H., Professor of Epidemiology and Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and JoAnn Manson, M.D., Dr. P.H., Chief, Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Professor of Medicine and the Michael and Lee Professor of Women’s Health, Harvard Medical School.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 86.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.