557
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Plantar pressures in three types of indigenous footwear, commercial minimal shoes, and conventional Western shoes, compared to barefoot walking

, , &
Pages 1-17 | Received 10 Jun 2020, Accepted 04 Sep 2020, Published online: 13 Oct 2020
 

Abstract

Humans evolved as barefoot walkers, and only started to use footwear recently in evolutionary history. It can be questioned what the effect is of footwear on gait. This effect has previously been studied for a range of conventional and athletic footwear, but this study focuses on indigenous footwear which does not have the features commonly associated with conventional footwear, such as a raised heel, a relatively narrow toe box, arch support, and a firm heel cup. We will assess whether such footwear can be considered functionally ‘minimal’ and simulate barefoot walking, by analysing spatial and temporal aspects of plantar pressure distribution. We first compare the 2 D spatial distribution of plantar pressure, using 2 D Statistical Parametric Mapping, between four populations walking barefoot and with indigenous or commercial minimal shoes. We compared Indians wearing sandal-like footwear (‘Kolhapuri’), Scandinavians wearing boot-type footwear (‘Nuvttohat’), Namibian San wearing sandal-like footwear (‘N!ang n|osi’) and Western Europeans wearing a commercial minimal shoe, and conventional Western footwear. Within each population, indigenous and commercial barefoot footwear data were compared to barefoot walking. No statistically significant differences were found within-population between all footwear conditions and barefoot walking. Second, we question whether there were 1 D temporal differences in centre of pressure movements between three footwear conditions (barefoot, commercial minimal, conventional Western) within one, Western, population. Using 1 D Statistical Parametric Mapping, differences between these three conditions are shown, with barefoot walking keeping a more proximal CoP position than both footwear conditions during most of push-off phase. Based on plantar pressure recordings, we conclude that all indigenous and commercial minimal shoes can functionally be considered ‘minimal footwear’, but with some differences to barefoot walking.

Acknowledgements

We greatly appreciate the collaboration of all participants in this study. Special thanks go to the artisan community of Toehold in India, Sogsakk in Finland, the San Community in Namibia, Vivobarefoot and the M2Ocean lab of the University of Antwerp.

Disclosure statement

A full set of Vivobarefoot ‘The One’ minimal shoes was donated to Catherine Willems by Vivobarefoot, London, UK.

Additional information

Funding

This research was funded by KASK & Conservatorium, the School of Arts of HoGent and HoWest, and Future Footwear Foundation, Ghent, Belgium.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 340.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.