114
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Patient-reported outcomes following interposition arthroplasty of the basal joint of the thumb

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 105-110 | Received 08 Jun 2020, Accepted 25 Sep 2020, Published online: 12 Oct 2020
 

Abstract

The purpose of this study was (1) to evaluate the results following thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) interposition arthroplasties with patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in a large prospective series, (2) to evaluate the correlation between PRO and patient satisfaction following surgery, (3) to evaluate if age, gender, occupational status, sports activities or operative technique correlate with the PRO following surgery. Quick-DASH ranges from 0 to 100 with 100 being the worst score. The mean preoperative Quick-DASH was 49.9. The mean 6 months postoperative Quick-DASH was 25.4 showing an average improvement of 24.6 points. Mixed model analysis revealed a further improvement in Quick-DASH and pain after 6 months. Satisfied patients had significantly lower pain scores and lower Quick-DASH at follow up as compared to dissatisfied patients. Age, gender, hobby activities, occupational status and operative technique do not seem to influence PRO after CMC interposition arthroplasty of the thumb.

Level of evidence

II – prospective cohort.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Bo Sanderhoff Olsen, Tobias Wirenfeldt Klausen.

Ethical approval

The National Ethical Committee does not require ethical approval for reporting Patient Reported Outcomes. The Danish Patient Safety Authority approved the study: 3-3013-2899/1. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before the study.

Author contributions

CHJ conceived the study. AO and BSO were involved in protocol development, database maintenance. RWJ did statistical analysis, drafting of manuscripts, gained approval from the Danish Patient Safety Authority. FF reviewed 250 patient charts for retrospective complication analysis. HD was involved in data collection and maintenance. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

The author(s) declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.