72
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Prognostic factors for outcomes of surgical mobilisation in patients with posttraumatic limited range of motion of the proximal interphalangeal joint: a multivariate analysis

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 133-137 | Received 06 Jul 2019, Accepted 01 Jul 2021, Published online: 01 Oct 2021
 

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors for outcomes of surgical mobilisation in patients with posttraumatic limited range of motion (ROM) of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint and determine which procedure actually improves the PIP joint ROM. A total of 71 fingers (57 patients: 49 men, 8 women; mean age, 41 years) with posttraumatic limited passive ROM of the PIP joint (<60°) who underwent surgical mobilisation were reviewed. Possible prognostic factors, including age, injury type, injured finger, injury in the adjacent finger, and procedure types, were assessed. We defined the PIP joint ROM improvement as the primary outcome in the linear regression analysis. To evaluate surgical efficacy, we classified the surgical treatment options into four categories (volar release, dorsal release, volar and dorsal release, and joint distraction with an external fixator) and compared their outcomes. The mean postoperative improvement in the PIP joint ROM was 12°. In the linear regression analysis, advanced age (estimate, −0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.76 to −0.06), open injury (estimate, −13.54; 95% CI −27.02 to −0.06), and skin defects (estimate, −23.22; 95% CI −34.83 to −11.61) were associated with worse outcomes; however, the volar approach was associated with favourable outcomes. Surgical mobilisation is strongly recommended when limited ROM of the PIP joint is caused by flexion site contracture. To improve the final outcome of fingers with complex injuries, a tailored treatment strategy is required to avoid dorsal release.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Editage [http://www.editage.com] for editing and reviewing this manuscript’s English language.

Disclosure statement

No potential competing interest was reported by the author(s).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.