Unleashing traditional ecological knowledge for biodiversity conservation and resilience to climate change in Rwanda

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess how traditional ecological knowledge systems can be leveraged to achieve biodiversity conservation and build resilience to climate change. A sequential mixed methods approach was used to study 379 local people residing around the Nyungwe National Park, Rwanda. Rusizi district was purposively sampled and as well as three sectors in it, within which random sampling was used to sample the villages, in which households were sampled conveniently and the locals purposively. Structured interviews and focus group discussions were used to collect data. Quantitative data collected were analyzed in SPSS 25 and the qualitative data thematically analyzed. The results indicate that all biodiversity conservation principles were practised by 71% (n = 270) of the local people. The widest spread species in Nyungwe National Park are trees (n = 219, 57.8%). However, bush burning is practised outside the park (n = 328, 86.5%). Controlled tree cutting (adjusted odds ratio, AOR = 1.167, CI = 1.007–2.032), and awareness of biodiversity and practice measures that usually avoid harm to biodiversity (AOR = 1.610, CI = 1.029–2.519), are protective of biodiversity conservation. Biodiversity conservation is not universal among locals residing around Nyungwe National Park; only 7 in 10 of them are conservation-oriented. Knowledge about forest conservation and controlled bush-burning practices are most the most protective of conservation.

Keywords:

• traditional ecological knowledge
• climate change
• biodiversity conservation

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the community of traditional healers for sharing their valuable information through the surveys. The authors sincerely appreciate Beth A. Kaplin, Professor of the Centre of Excellence in Biodiversity Conservation and Natural Resources (CoEB), University of Rwanda. She helped greatly, especially through the conceptualization and initial reading of the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Authors’ Contributions

Conceptualization, N.K.T. & M.C.G.; Literature review & Data curation, N.K.T.; Methodology, N.K.T., M.C.G. & D.N.; Writing original draft, N.K.T.; Writing-Review & Editing, N.K.T. and D.N.