368
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Directed forgetting instructions decrease proactive interference within working memory below that of a baseline encode-only condition

ORCID Icon
Pages 734-746 | Received 27 Oct 2019, Accepted 09 Sep 2020, Published online: 23 Sep 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Directed forgetting involves the targeted removal of memory representations. Previous research has indicated that directed forgetting in working memory reduces the amount of proactive interference for to-be-forgotten memoranda relative to to-be-remembered memoranda. However, it is unknown how directed forgetting within working memory compares to an encode-only condition, in which items are encoded but do not receive a forget cue nor a remember instruction. Here, younger adults (N = 43) performed a working memory directed forgetting task with encode-only trials and a recent probes manipulation to induce proactive interference. Results indicated that (1) proactive interference for encoded-only items did not significantly differ from proactive interference for to-be-remembered items, and (2) proactive interference for to-be-forgotten items was significantly lower than that for both the remember and encode-only conditions. Thus, the present research provides support for the theories that directed forgetting instructions result in differential weakening of targeted memory representations in working memory, and that forget instructions promote goal-directed removal of memory representations. Forget instructions do not simply curtail processing after encoding. This research adds to the understanding of the removal of information from working memory and to the consequences and mechanistic processes of directed forgetting within working memory.

Acknowledgements

I thank Brendon Bloomfield, Thresia Casanova, Emilee Mendoza, and Elena Sakosky for their assistance with data collection at the University of Tampa.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability

Data from this study is available at the University of Tampa institutional repository.

Notes

1 See Appendix B for a detailed breakdown of excluded inaccurate trials by trial type.

2 Bonferroni corrections were only applied to RT follow-up tests.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 298.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.