130
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Improving Pain Care Using Psychosocial Screening and Patient Education among Veterans

Pages 275-286 | Published online: 22 Nov 2021
 

Abstract

Pain education programming is considered one avenue of treatment for comorbid chronic pain and mental health disorders. The purpose of the current single group, longitudinal ex post facto study was to determine whether participation in a pain education program would decrease symptoms on psychiatric and functional disability domains using emerging screening measures. A sample of 90 Veterans participated in a pain education program at a Midwestern VA Medical Center between November 1, 2013 and October 31, 2014. The Pain Education School program is a comprehensive program that is open to all Veterans and introduces them to different modalities that deal with chronic pain available in the VA hospital. All participants completed pre- and post-education screening measures. Paired-samples t-tests were conducted to evaluate the impact of the pain education program on Veterans’ scores on these measures. The current study found a significant difference in depression (p=.005; d=.18), mobility (p=.000; d=.47), social participation (p=.001; d=.30), and total functional disability scores (p=.001; d=.30) upon completion of the program. The current study serves as a model of how to use emerging screening measures and education programming to enhance clinical practice and decision-making to better address Veterans’ needs.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank all the Veterans and providers who made this research possible. A special thanks to Erica Lin, Ashley Rollnick, Elizabeth Simmons, Abbey Hughes, and Leland Bardsley for their assistance in the Pain Education School program and the data collection. The author would also like to thank the Anesthesiology/Pain Clinic Department, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, for their vision and ongoing support of the Pain Education School program.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest in this article.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 122.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.