Evaluation of the relation between size of stone and its attenuation measured by Hounsfield units and the total laser energy required to fragment it

Abstract

Background

Anticipating the total laser energy (TLE) of Holmium YAG laser required for ureteroscopic (URS) lithotripsy is essential to guide urologists in selecting the optimal fiber size. This study aimed at evaluating the relationship between stone size and stone attenuation measured by HU as predictors for the TLE during the procedure.

Methods

We conducted an observational prospective cohort study of patients undergoing URS lithotripsy at the Urology department of Ain Shams University Hospitals from September 2018 to September 2019 with the use of a holmium YAG laser as the lithotripsy method. Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, stone location, stone size, stone attenuation measured by HU from the non-contrast CT, TLE, and procedure time were recorded. Data were analyzed using Jamovi software (version 2.0 for macOS).

Results

Forty patients were included in the study (22 males and 18 females) with a mean age of 57.8 years. The mean stone size was 9.8 mm³, the mean HU was 858.8 units, and the mean TLE was 3.5 KJ. Both stone size and stone attenuation measured by HU were positively correlated with TLE (r = 0.81 and 0.84, respectively; p < 0.001 for both). Further, regression analysis showed that both variables could significantly predict the TLE (ß = 0.001 and 0.71, respectively).

Conclusions

Both stone attenuation, as measured by HU, and stone size positively correlate with TLE required for URS lithotripsy. Therefore, both HU and stone size can predict the TLE, which will be helpful to guide the urologist in selecting the optimal fiber size for the procedure.

Keywords:

• Ureteroscopy
• stone
• holmium laser
• lithotripsy

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Data CliNiX Ltd. Istanbul, Turkey (Website: https://www.dataclinix.com/) for drafting the initial version of the manuscript, providing language editing for the authors’ final version, and for reviewing the statistical analysis.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).