Comparative study of two Chinese versions of Montreal Cognitive Assessment for Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Abstract

Our aim was to compare the utility and accuracy of the Chinese Version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Basic (MoCA-BC) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Beijing Version (MoCA-BJ) in the identification of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) under different education levels. A sample of individuals with MCI (n = 295), Alzheimer's disease (AD; n = 254), and normal controls (NC; n = 259) at 2 Memory Clinics and communities was administered the MoCA-BC, MoCA-BJ, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and other neuropsychological tests. The discriminant validity of the MoCA-BC and MoCA-BJ as diagnostic instruments was ascertained. The overall discriminant validity for detection of MCI from NC (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve [95% confidence interval]) was that the MoCA-BC (0.95 [0.93, 0.97]) had better sensitivity and accuracy than MoCA-BJ (0.87 [0.84, 0.90]). In addition, we provide an easy to use table that enables the conversion of MoCA-BC to the MoCA-BJ scores or to MMSE scores. The MoCA-BC and MoCA-BJ provided good diagnostic accuracy when compared to MMSE. The MoCA-BC, which was proved to be an appropriate tool when screening for MCI among elderly subjects, can now be compared directly with the MoCA-BJ.

Keywords:

• Chinese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic
• Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Beijing
• Mild cognitive impairment
• Alzheimer’s disease

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors. Ziad Nasreddine is the copyright owner of the MoCA test. Q.-H. Guo obtained permission to translate the MoCA-B from Z. Nasreddine.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC1306305] to Q.-H. Guo and the Shanghai Technology and Science Key Project in Healthcare [No. 17441902100] to Q.-H. Guo.