557
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentaries

Addressing Anti-Fat Bias in Psychology: Education and Resistance

Pages 252-258 | Received 17 Apr 2019, Accepted 24 Apr 2019, Published online: 18 Oct 2019
 

Abstract

This is a commentary on Ward and McPhail’s (Citation2019) article “Fat Shame and Blame in Reproductive Care: Implications for Ethical Health Care Interactions.” Here I note the importance of good mental health to positive pregnancy and childbirth experiences and consider whether psychologists and other mental health professionals share medical providers’ tendencies to blame and shame their fat clients (they do). I discuss the absence of coverage of sizeism (fat prejudice) in textbooks used to train psychology graduate students, students’ and trainees’ resistance to discussions of sizeism in classes and workshops, and the importance of intersectionality and consideration of fat as a social identity. Resources for teaching and practicing fat-affirmative psychotherapy are provided.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 89.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.