ABSTRACT
This article investigates the impact that interest groups exert on the cybersecurity strategy of democratic countries. My findings are twofold. First, interest groups have shaped the strategy of many democracies by promoting transparency and civil rights as well as through open debate and policy scrutiny. They have consolidated their role as guardians of institutional accountability. They have subjected lawmakers to the power of the electoral majority to veto offensive policy and demanded that government officials comply with international rules of behaviour. Second, I explore interest groups in mature democracies in the United States, Europe and Japan to show that the national response to cyber threats is broadly shaped by interest groups working closely with the government to ensure that its policy remain within the general framework of a larger, vibrant civil society. Specifically, I demonstrate these points by using Japan as a case study. Japanese interest groups have acknowledged that cyberattacks pose a threat to Japanese consumers and opposed the adoption of radical policy to counter them. Japan's case indicates how interest groups can promote voters' preferences through the advocacy of privacy protection and the collective opposition to constitutional revision that is needed for radical policy.
Acknowledgment
The author thanks Robert Cropf for his constructive feedback to an early version of this article.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Nori Katagiri
Nori Katagiri is associate professor of political science and director of international studies at Saint Louis University. His Ph.D. is in political science from the University of Pennsylvania. Prior to joining Saint Louis University, he was associate professor of international security studies at Air War College, Maxwell AFB. His research interests include security issues in cybersecurity, international security, and East Asia.