113
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Comparison of MIRU-VNTR genotyping between old and fresh clinical samples in tuberculosis

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 659-667 | Received 08 Feb 2019, Accepted 27 Jun 2019, Published online: 17 Jul 2019
 

Abstract

Background: Twenty-four loci mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable number tandem repeat analysis (MIRU-VNTR) is extensively used for genotyping and detection of polyclonal infections in tuberculosis. The aim of the present study was to compare the direct and indirect MIRU-VNTR genotyping and detection of polyclonal infections between old and fresh clinical samples.

Method: Two series of TB samples were collected for comparison. After genomic DNA extraction from clinical samples and their respective cultures, 24 loci MIRU-VNTR was performed.

Results: In the 14 old samples, no mixed infections were observed, in clinical samples and their respective cultures. In nine fresh samples, 44.4% of mixed infection was observed in the clinical samples, but no mixed infections were observed in their respective cultures. Surprisingly, in the old samples, 92.86% of samples (13/14) had an allelic change between clinical samples and their respective cultures. On the other hand, in fresh samples, only one sample (1/9) had an allelic change between clinical samples and their respective cultures.

Conclusions: We concluded that 24 loci MIRU-VNTR undoubtedly is successful in direct genotyping of clinical samples, especially for the fresh samples. However, selecting starting material, such as clinical sample or respective culture can be controversial for the old samples. Regarding polyclonal infections, the fresh samples gives us a better view to detect these infections, especially in the clinical sample.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the personnel of Mycobacteriology and Pulmonary Research Department, Pasteur Institute of Iran for their assistance in this project. The funding bodies had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by a grant [Number 927] from Pasteur Institute of Iran and a grant [project no. 94009958] by Iran National Science Foundation.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 174.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.