272
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Competitive balance within CONCACAF: a longitudinal and comparative descriptive review of the seasons 2002/2003–2017/2018

ORCID Icon
Pages 445-460 | Received 15 Mar 2019, Accepted 23 Oct 2019, Published online: 11 Nov 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Rationale/Purpose: This article examines the trend in competitive balance and its association with end-of-year FIFA rankings among CONCACAF football associates.

Design/methodology/approach: Secondary data were collected from the football domestic league tables for the seasons 2002/2003–2017/2018 of Costa Rica, Mexico, USA, Panama, Jamaica, Honduras, Trinidad and Tobago and Canada. Competitive balance was assessed using the Five-Club Concentration Ratio Index of Competitive Balance (C5ICB), Herfindahl Index of Competitive Balance (HICB) and Lorenz Seasonal Balance Curve. Linear regression modeling was used to assess the relationship between end-of-year FIFA ranking and competitive balance.

Findings: The most competitive league was the USA, Honduras and Mexico, while the least competitive leagues were Trinidad and Tobago, Canada and Panama. For the 2017/2018 season within CONCACAF it was seen that the football leagues of the Jamaica, USA, Mexico and Panama were the most competitive balance leagues. The HICB and C5ICB were both significant predictors of a change in CONCACAF countries end-of-year FIFA rankings.

Practical Implications: Competitive balance continues to be a vital component in assessing the viability and competitiveness of a football league which may have direct impacts on league authorities, marketing revenue streams and spectator attractions.

Research Contribution: This is the first study to describe competitive balance in CONCACAF.

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the governing body for football FIFA and CONCACAF.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Availability of data

The study data will be shared upon request as it is publicly available.

Ethical approval

No ethical approval was needed for this study.

Additional information

Funding

This study was self-funded and was not sponsored by any agency/organization.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 689.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.