ABSTRACT
Research in contentious and fluctuating political and economic conditions presents many challenges. Given the potential for the politicization of research in an era where information is rapidly changing, there is pressure to consider pathways to ensure quality and transparent research. This perspective builds upon a tradition of considering the methodological implications associated with conducting research within volatile settings. The paper reflects on the research process associated with interviewing mobile workers at BC Hydro’s Site C Project (hydroelectric dam) in northeast British Columbia, Canada. Based on these reflections, we explore opportunities to extend the transparency of research in volatile settings by considering the broader political and subjective influences that shape credibility and validity as universities, industry, and labour engage with the research process.
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1. BC Hydro’s Site C Clean Energy Project proposes to develop a third dam and hydroelectric generating station on the Peace River, providing up to 1100 MW of capacity and 5100 GWh of energy annually. Construction began in 2015.