495
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Practitioner Paper

Risk-taking Propensity: A Comparison between Pilots and Members of the General Population

, ORCID Icon &
Pages 138-151 | Published online: 13 Oct 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Objective

The aim of this research was to understand risk, predictors of risk, and for pilots the relationship between personality as determined by the risk prediction scales and flight performance.

Background

Risk-taking is a topic that draws attention because of its link with the causation of injury. In the literature, there are a large number of papers linking personality traits to self-reported risk-taking, in addition to theoretical commentaries. In contrast, there are very few empirical studies that examine the link between personality traits, such as risk-taking and actual risk-taking behavior.

Method

One hundred university students with no flying experience (59 females) and 17 pilots (five females) completed a battery of personality and risk scales. Pilots were also tasked to complete a simulated flight involving a low-level flying task.

Results

The results revealed that pilots had a higher propensity for risk than the general population. However, this risk was tempered by the personality factor of self-control. Evidence of this juxtaposed position was present during the simulated flight; pilots’ propensity for risky behavior was inversely related to actual risk-taking behavior.

Conclusion

These results indicate a dichotomy in risk-takers, impetuous and calculative risk-takers. These findings have important implications for pilot selection and training.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the commitment of the volunteers. Without their involvement, advances in science would not be possible. The authors would also like to thank the staff at UNSW Sydney Flying Operations Unit for their assistance in programming the flight simulator. The authors would also like to thank Nancy Briggs from UNSW Stats Central for her assistance with the true scores (diattenuation correlation coefficients) analysis.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 440.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.