472
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Technical involvements and pressure applied influence movement demands in elite Australian Football Match-play

, , ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 228-233 | Accepted 04 Jun 2021, Published online: 28 Jun 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Match activity analyses in Australian Football (AF) have provided information on the loads of match-play and identified contextual factors influencing physical activity. Match physical activity has been shown to be influenced by technical and tactical factors. This study examined the association of in-game contextual factors and technical involvements on the activity demands of elite AF players. Global positioning system data were recorded from 35 players in 13 matches throughout the 2019 Australian Football League (AFL) season. Technical involvements – player possession, and defensive pressure applied – were attained from Champion Data (AFL statistics provider), while possession phases and the commencing possession chain event were manually coded. Mixed models examined the influence possession chain contextual factors had on the total distance (TD) and high-speed running (HSR). During attacking phases, physical activity increased when a player had a possession, when a greater number of opposition players applied pressure, and when play was initiated from a turnover (p ≤ 0.001). During defensive phases, physical activity was greatest when an individual player applied pressure, however, also increased when the total number of players applying pressure increased and when play was initiated from a turnover or kick-in (p ≤ 0.001). Overall, this study combines the three constructs of AF performance (physical, technical and tactical) and demonstrates that TD and HSR demands are greatest in a chain when a player was directly involved in the play or applying pressure on the opposition.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP scholarship).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Research Training Program [Fee offset,Stipend].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 280.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.