Perpetration of intimate partner violence and guilt: the role of parenting status

Abstract

A paucity of research addresses individual differences in the experience of moral emotions (e.g., guilt) related to one’s intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration. Because IPV exposure negatively impacts children, we examined whether IPV perpetration is differentially associated with guilt for parents and non-parents. We conducted multilevel regression analyses among 103 individuals from 52 heterosexual community couples. Parent status moderated the association, such that non-parents reported greater overall, state, and trait guilt in association with greater IPV perpetration whereas parents did not. Parent status did not moderate the relations between IPV victimization and guilt, suggesting that this result is specific to perpetration. We further observed differences with regard to emotion regulation, such that parents had greater difficulty attending to their emotions. Parents may exhibit muted guilt in relation to their perpetration, potentially due to difficulty attending to their emotions. Because guilt in relation to IPV perpetration is a relatively new area of study, research is needed to further elucidate the mechanisms and directionality of this relationship. Current findings suggest that emotion regulation strategies that foster healthy processing of guilt may be important considerations for IPV prevention and intervention research, particularly those that address vulnerability for IPV during the transition to parenthood.

Keywords:

• Aggression
• domestic violence
• family
• relationship
• shame

Additional information

Funding

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE1255832. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.