The Role of the Capsaicin 8% Patch in the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Abstract

Treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) is challenging and often limited by drug tolerability and adverse effects. This review article focuses on the high-dose (8%) capsaicin patch that allows for improved efficacy and reduced application frequency in comparison to low-dose capsaicin formulations. Systemic absorption is minimal resulting in fewer systemic side effects than first-line oral medications. There is evidence that capsaicin patch treatment is well-tolerated, safe and provides effective pain relief maintained for several weeks; well-powered studies are needed to confirm these findings. The capsaicin 8% patch may benefit patients at high risk for adverse effects from oral medication, polypharmacy or inadequate pain relief from first-line therapies.

Plain language summary

Treatment of nerve pain in the feet and other regions due to nerve damage from diabetes is challenging, often due to the unwanted side effects of medications. This review article focuses on the high-dose (8%) capsaicin patch, which can be applied directly to the feet. It is more potent than the low-dose formulations, allowing patients to apply it less often while also working more effectively compared with low-dose capsaicin creams. Because it acts directly on the skin, there are fewer systemic side effects such as drowsiness or urinary retention. There is evidence that capsaicin patch treatment is safe and provides pain relief for several weeks. More large studies are needed to confirm these findings. The capsaicin 8% patch may benefit patients at high risk for side effects from oral medications or inadequate pain relief from first-line medications.

Keywords::

• neurology
• neuropathic pain
• pain
• pain management
• peripheral neuropathies

Author contributions

Y Leavell conducted the literature search and wrote the majority of the draft manuscript text. D Simpson reviewed the literature search and contributed substantive revisions and editorial oversight to the final manuscript.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

D Simpson receives Research Grant Support and Consulting Honoraria from Averitas/Grunenthal. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Company review disclosure

In addition to the peer-review process, with the author’s consent, the manufacturer of the product discussed in this article was given the opportunity to review the manuscript for factual accuracy. Changes were made by the author at their discretion and based on scientific or editorial merit only. The author maintained full control over the manuscript, including content, wording and conclusions.

Additional information

Funding

D Simpson receives Research Grant Support and Consulting Honoraria from Averitas/Grunenthal. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.