Figures & data
Table 1 Distribution of different studied perforators in relation to sex.
![](/cms/asset/907d7a5b-ad38-4ca7-acb1-fc408ec0e41a/tajm_a_12059878_f0001_ob.jpg)
![](/cms/asset/b19527fb-4a2f-4a39-9afa-9e97aca57a51/tajm_a_12059878_f0002_ob.jpg)
![](/cms/asset/4f3f732b-fcbc-4695-94e8-57a4c0989276/tajm_a_12059878_f0003_ob.jpg)
![](/cms/asset/536605ab-99ee-48cf-95cf-d10f530a7ce4/tajm_a_12059878_f0004_ob.jpg)
![](/cms/asset/a506d309-886b-4a66-a148-a6bd383c292d/tajm_a_12059878_f0005_ob.jpg)
Table 2 Comparison between length and diameter of muscular branches of popliteal artery in both male and female.
![](/cms/asset/7119310d-896c-4c48-bc09-e29c8e681877/tajm_a_12059878_f0006_ob.jpg)
![](/cms/asset/f4df1a13-bcd1-44ab-8f85-86e8195e5122/tajm_a_12059878_f0008_ob.jpg)
![](/cms/asset/9f042474-94b1-4cc2-8d6d-158f05c3a795/tajm_a_12059878_f0009_ob.jpg)
Table 3 Comparison between length and diameter of muscular branches of posterior tibial artery in both male and female.
Table 4 Comparison between the distance of muscular branches of posterior tibial artery from medial malleolus in male and female in cm.
![](/cms/asset/303ca84d-b0b1-4706-ba27-fd99b5b64c0a/tajm_a_12059878_f0007_ob.jpg)
![](/cms/asset/cbc6898b-9b5f-4c71-80eb-37a8060e5a6c/tajm_a_12059878_f0010_ob.jpg)
![](/cms/asset/a81e3925-b1a2-4685-9efb-192c38f120e4/tajm_a_12059878_f0011_ob.jpg)