Figures & data
Fig. 1 Absorption spectra of the MTB method: (A) Reaction product of ETM (15 μg/ml) with F–C reagent in Na2CO3 solution; (B) the blank.
![](/cms/asset/94861806-dce7-4527-8115-e583ded9d359/tusc_a_12002172_f0010_ob.jpg)
Fig. 2 Absorption spectra of PB method: (A) Reaction product of ETM (2 μg/ml) with iron(III) and ferricyanide in HCl medium; (B) the corresponding blank.
![](/cms/asset/c5c6ab81-1974-48e7-ad0f-6353c255c4d4/tusc_a_12002172_f0015_ob.jpg)
Fig. 4 (a) Effect of the F–C reagent concentration (ETM, 15 μg/ml). (b) Effect of 20% Na2CO3 (ETM, 15 μg/ml).
![](/cms/asset/a1c52fe4-7a98-4cc8-b29b-c0d33b07ab2f/tusc_a_12002172_f0025_ob.jpg)
Fig. 5 (a) Effect of the iron(III) concentration (ETM, 2.0 μg/ml). (b) Effect of the potassium ferricyanide concentration (ETM, 2.0 μg/ml). (c) Effect of the HCl concentration (ETM, 2.0 μg/ml).
![](/cms/asset/4f37b1e6-72cc-42f0-84f8-741b2d999103/tusc_a_12002172_f0030_ob.jpg)
Fig. 6 (a) Calibration curve for the Molybdenum-tungsten blue method. (b) Calibration curve for the Prussian blue method.
![](/cms/asset/da7e18ea-a7f1-4edc-87b3-f87420a68aaf/tusc_a_12002172_f0035_ob.jpg)
Table 1 Sensitivity and regression parameters.
Table 2 Evaluation of intra-day and inter-day accuracy and precision.
Table 3 Method robustness and ruggedness expressed as intermediate precision (% RSD).
Table 4 Results of analysis of tablets by the proposed methods and statistical comparison of the results with the official method.
Table 5 Results of recovery experiment through standard-addition method.
Table 6 Comparison of the proposed and the existing spectrophotometric methods.