Figures & data
a Control. b Cells infected with the synthetic virus. c Western blotting using anti-EV-D68 VP1 antibodies. Lane1: marker; lane2: cell control; lane3: Fermon virus; lane4: synthetic virus
![Fig. 1 Cytopathic effects observed in RD cells (×10).a Control. b Cells infected with the synthetic virus. c Western blotting using anti-EV-D68 VP1 antibodies. Lane1: marker; lane2: cell control; lane3: Fermon virus; lane4: synthetic virus](/cms/asset/e7e48e1a-894a-487a-818d-71acf85cf832/temi_a_12040010_f0001_ob.jpg)
a Comparison of the NtAbs of anti-EV-D68 against the synthetic virus and Fermon (p = 0.0378). b The correlation of NtAbs against EV-D68 between the synthetic virus and Fermon (r = 0.444)
![Fig. 2 Comparison of the synthetic virus and the Fermon strain in NtAbs using 50 adult serum samples.a Comparison of the NtAbs of anti-EV-D68 against the synthetic virus and Fermon (p = 0.0378). b The correlation of NtAbs against EV-D68 between the synthetic virus and Fermon (r = 0.444)](/cms/asset/e1f6a637-8a99-4b7b-a31d-c16085ef6376/temi_a_12040010_f0002_ob.jpg)
Seroprevalence rates and GMTs of NtAbs from the blood samples of 20 pairs of prenatal women and their neonates
Relationship of EV-D68 NtAbs in blood samples collected from prenatal women and their neonates
a EV-D68 NtAb prevalence (100%) by age group; “n” was the number of the serum samples. b The GMT (positive serum) and seroprevalence rates were evaluated in different age groups
![Fig. 3 Seroprevalence rate and GMTs of anti-EV-D68 in blood samples of 0-year-old to 15-year-old children.a EV-D68 NtAb prevalence (100%) by age group; “n” was the number of the serum samples. b The GMT (positive serum) and seroprevalence rates were evaluated in different age groups](/cms/asset/0387a5a7-816d-41e8-83dd-bcba1adc9b87/temi_a_12040010_f0003_ob.jpg)
Seroprevalence rates and GMTs of EV-D68 neutralizing antibodies among age groups