121
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY

Comparative Study of Electrospray and Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization with Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry for Quantification of Five Antihyperglycemic Agents Utilizing Monolithic Column

, , , &
Pages 1947-1959 | Received 18 Jan 2012, Accepted 08 Mar 2012, Published online: 20 Sep 2012
 

Abstract

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) in atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) and electrospray ionization (ESI) modes were studied for a multi-component plasma and urine quantification of 5 antihyperglycemic agents (metformin, pioglitazone, gliclazide, glibenclamide, and glimperide). The separation of the compounds was achieved using Chromolith Performance RP-18e column (100 × 4.6 mm), with gradient mobile phase composition of acetonitrile −0.1% formic acid. MS parameters for APCI and ESI were optimized individually and were operated in positive mode. The detection limits for the metformin, pioglitazone, glibenclamide, and glimepiride were determined to be 6.84, 6.22, 13.03, and 44.38 ng mL−1 using LC-ESI-MS; and for LC-APCI-MS, it was determined to be 48.39, 8.02, 17.02, and 144.55 ng mL−1, respectively. Gliclazide was the only exception as it exhibited a lower limit of detection (LOD) using APCI than ESI which was found to be 5.61 and 23.43 ng mL−1, respectively. The method was validated for system suitability, linearity, precision and accuracy, specificity, stability, and robustness. The ESI as compared to APCI was found superior in many analytical parameters. The assay has been applied successfully to biological fluids (plasma and urine) of healthy volunteers.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very much thankful to “Birds Chemotec” Karachi, Pakistan for providing help in collecting antihyperglycemic standards from various pharmaceuticals and also to NCEAC, University of Sindh Jamshoro and PCSIR laboratories Complex, Karachi, Pakistan for providing the facilities to complete the research.

Notes

a Retention time for mobile phase flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1.

a Accuracy (%) = observed concentration × 100/used concentration.

b Coefficient of Variance (%) = S.D. × 100/mean.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 768.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.