Publication Cover
Applicable Analysis
An International Journal
Volume 98, 2019 - Issue 4
1,562
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The inverse electromagnetic scattering problem by a penetrable cylinder at oblique incidence

&
Pages 781-798 | Received 07 Jan 2017, Accepted 19 Jun 2017, Published online: 17 Nov 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1. The geometry of the scattering problem.

Figure 1. The geometry of the scattering problem.

Figure 2. Reconstruction of a peanut-shaped boundary for two incident fields, frequency ω=2.5, for exact data (left) and data with 5% noise (right).

Figure 2. Reconstruction of a peanut-shaped boundary for two incident fields, frequency ω=2.5, for exact data (left) and data with 5% noise (right).

Figure 3. Reconstruction of a peanut-shaped boundary for four incident fields, frequency ω=2.5, noisy data (5% noise), with initial guess r0=0.6 (left) and r0=1 (right).

Figure 3. Reconstruction of a peanut-shaped boundary for four incident fields, frequency ω=2.5, noisy data (5% noise), with initial guess r0=0.6 (left) and r0=1 (right).

Figure 4. Reconstruction of a peanut-shaped boundary for four incident fields, m=5 coefficients, frequency ω=2, for exact data (left) and data with 3% noise (right).

Figure 4. Reconstruction of a peanut-shaped boundary for four incident fields, m=5 coefficients, frequency ω=2, for exact data (left) and data with 3% noise (right).

Figure 5. Reconstruction of an apple-shaped boundary for four incident fields, frequency ω=3, exact data, with initial guess r0=0.5 (left) and r0=1 (right).

Figure 5. Reconstruction of an apple-shaped boundary for four incident fields, frequency ω=3, exact data, with initial guess r0=0.5 (left) and r0=1 (right).

Figure 6. Reconstruction of an apple-shaped boundary for four incident fields, frequency ω=3, data with 3% noise, for three (left) and four (right) incident fields.

Figure 6. Reconstruction of an apple-shaped boundary for four incident fields, frequency ω=3, data with 3% noise, for three (left) and four (right) incident fields.

Figure 7. Reconstruction of a peanut-shaped boundary for two incident fields (left) and an apple-shaped boundary for four incident fields (right). Here, we use θ=π/10,ω=7 and data with 3% noise.

Figure 7. Reconstruction of a peanut-shaped boundary for two incident fields (left) and an apple-shaped boundary for four incident fields (right). Here, we use θ=π/10,ω=7 and data with 3% noise.