Figures & data
Figure 2. Reconstruction of a peanut-shaped boundary for two incident fields, frequency for exact data (left) and data with
noise (right).
![Figure 2. Reconstruction of a peanut-shaped boundary for two incident fields, frequency ω=2.5, for exact data (left) and data with 5% noise (right).](/cms/asset/32d2d2b1-b665-4567-b129-dbb37ddb31e2/gapa_a_1402891_f0002_oc.gif)
Figure 3. Reconstruction of a peanut-shaped boundary for four incident fields, frequency noisy data (
noise), with initial guess
(left) and
(right).
![Figure 3. Reconstruction of a peanut-shaped boundary for four incident fields, frequency ω=2.5, noisy data (5% noise), with initial guess r0=0.6 (left) and r0=1 (right).](/cms/asset/425faf17-0eaf-45eb-96f3-bd41f1bc3356/gapa_a_1402891_f0003_oc.gif)
Figure 4. Reconstruction of a peanut-shaped boundary for four incident fields, coefficients, frequency
for exact data (left) and data with
noise (right).
![Figure 4. Reconstruction of a peanut-shaped boundary for four incident fields, m=5 coefficients, frequency ω=2, for exact data (left) and data with 3% noise (right).](/cms/asset/185b6a02-a3c7-4159-b9b4-efe9ad40def0/gapa_a_1402891_f0004_oc.gif)
Figure 5. Reconstruction of an apple-shaped boundary for four incident fields, frequency exact data, with initial guess
(left) and
(right).
![Figure 5. Reconstruction of an apple-shaped boundary for four incident fields, frequency ω=3, exact data, with initial guess r0=0.5 (left) and r0=1 (right).](/cms/asset/0a03ae0f-ffa9-4f1e-8678-e97ba0c62487/gapa_a_1402891_f0005_oc.gif)