4,169
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Clay 3D printing as a bio-design research tool: development of photosynthetic living building components

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 185-195 | Received 13 Sep 2021, Accepted 23 Mar 2022, Published online: 08 Apr 2022

Figures & data

Figure 1. (A) First geometry design iteration test with high level of complexity where distortion occurs during printing (B) Simple geometries with fewer polygon faces that display a higher level of fidelity in relation to the digital model.

Figure 1. (A) First geometry design iteration test with high level of complexity where distortion occurs during printing (B) Simple geometries with fewer polygon faces that display a higher level of fidelity in relation to the digital model.

Table 1. Geometry variations as design in software, sowing values prior to kiln firing that resulted in 20% shrinkage.

Figure 2. Clay 3D printing of (A) four, (B) one and (C) two wall ceramic vessels that have the same outer dimensions and variable inner volume.

Figure 2. Clay 3D printing of (A) four, (B) one and (C) two wall ceramic vessels that have the same outer dimensions and variable inner volume.

Figure 3. (A) 0% infill, (B) 15% rectilinear infill, (C) 15% aligned rectilinear infill, (D) 25% rectilinear infill, (E) 25% aligned rectilinear infill.

Figure 3. (A) 0% infill, (B) 15% rectilinear infill, (C) 15% aligned rectilinear infill, (D) 25% rectilinear infill, (E) 25% aligned rectilinear infill.

Figure 4. (A) Porcelain, (B) White Fleck, (C) ES65.

Figure 4. (A) Porcelain, (B) White Fleck, (C) ES65.

Figure 5. (A) Algae Auro binder and kappa carrageenan matrix being applied to an inset sample using a brush, (B) Algae kappa carrageenan matrix coated ceramic samples.

Figure 5. (A) Algae Auro binder and kappa carrageenan matrix being applied to an inset sample using a brush, (B) Algae kappa carrageenan matrix coated ceramic samples.

Figure 6. (Left) Algae Auro binder matrix 1 Wall Day 0, imaged using I-PAM (Right) Same sample and imaging method Day 14 showing increase in cells and cell migration to the well-plate. Black indicates an absence of photosynthetic cells, whilst greens and blues indicate highest amount of chlorophyll fluorescence. [See Colour Online].

Figure 6. (Left) Algae Auro binder matrix 1 Wall Day 0, imaged using I-PAM (Right) Same sample and imaging method Day 14 showing increase in cells and cell migration to the well-plate. Black indicates an absence of photosynthetic cells, whilst greens and blues indicate highest amount of chlorophyll fluorescence. [See Colour Online].

Figure 7. SEM images of (Left) stoneware ceramic fired at 1000°C (Right) stoneware ceramic fired at 1200°C.

Figure 7. SEM images of (Left) stoneware ceramic fired at 1000°C (Right) stoneware ceramic fired at 1200°C.

Figure 8. Fluorescence yield (n = 3, mean ± 0.027 StDev) of algae grown over 14 days while immobilized within kappa carrageenan on single walled vessels fired at 1000 and 1200°C compared with suspension and gel controls.

Figure 8. Fluorescence yield (n = 3, mean ± 0.027 StDev) of algae grown over 14 days while immobilized within kappa carrageenan on single walled vessels fired at 1000 and 1200°C compared with suspension and gel controls.

Figure 9. Fluorescence yield (n = 3, mean ± 0.060 StDev) of algae grown over 14 days while immobilized within kappa carrageenan on multiwalled vessels fired at 1000°C compared with the single walled vessels.

Figure 9. Fluorescence yield (n = 3, mean ± 0.060 StDev) of algae grown over 14 days while immobilized within kappa carrageenan on multiwalled vessels fired at 1000°C compared with the single walled vessels.

Figure 10. Fluorescence yield (n = 3, mean ± 0.036 StDev) of algae grown over 14 days while immobilized within Auro 331 on single walled vessels fired at 1000 and 1200°C compared with suspension and gel controls.

Figure 10. Fluorescence yield (n = 3, mean ± 0.036 StDev) of algae grown over 14 days while immobilized within Auro 331 on single walled vessels fired at 1000 and 1200°C compared with suspension and gel controls.

Figure 11. Fluorescence yield (n = 3, mean ± 0.060 StDev) of algae grown over 14 days while immobilized within Auro 331 on multi-walled vessels fired at 1000°C compared with the single walled vessels.

Figure 11. Fluorescence yield (n = 3, mean ± 0.060 StDev) of algae grown over 14 days while immobilized within Auro 331 on multi-walled vessels fired at 1000°C compared with the single walled vessels.

Figure 12. Fluorescence yield (n = 3, mean ± 0.041 StDev) of algae grown over 14 days while immobilized within kappa carrageenan on multi-internal subdivision double walled vessels fired at 1000°C.

Figure 12. Fluorescence yield (n = 3, mean ± 0.041 StDev) of algae grown over 14 days while immobilized within kappa carrageenan on multi-internal subdivision double walled vessels fired at 1000°C.

Figure 13. Fluorescence yield (n = 3, mean ± 0.067 StDev) of algae grown over 14 days while immobilized within Auro 331 on multi-internal subdivision double walled vessels fired at 1000°C.

Figure 13. Fluorescence yield (n = 3, mean ± 0.067 StDev) of algae grown over 14 days while immobilized within Auro 331 on multi-internal subdivision double walled vessels fired at 1000°C.

Figure 14. Fluorescence yield (n = 3, mean ± 0.050 StDev) of algae grown over 14 days while immobilized within Auro 331on multiple clay type, double walled vessels fired at 1000°C.

Figure 14. Fluorescence yield (n = 3, mean ± 0.050 StDev) of algae grown over 14 days while immobilized within Auro 331on multiple clay type, double walled vessels fired at 1000°C.

Figure 15. Fluorescence yield (n = 3, mean ± 0.055 StDev) of algae grown over 14 days while immobilized within Auro 331on multiple clay type, double walled vessels fired at 1000°C.

Figure 15. Fluorescence yield (n = 3, mean ± 0.055 StDev) of algae grown over 14 days while immobilized within Auro 331on multiple clay type, double walled vessels fired at 1000°C.

Figure 16. Photograph and I-PAM of 2 Wall sample fired at 1000°C with Auro binder (A) day 0 (B) day 14. The images demonstrate how the matrix visibly acquires a darker green colour indicating higher cell density whilst the I-PAM images demonstrate lighter areas in outward folds except for top edge which offers a flat surface.

Figure 16. Photograph and I-PAM of 2 Wall sample fired at 1000°C with Auro binder (A) day 0 (B) day 14. The images demonstrate how the matrix visibly acquires a darker green colour indicating higher cell density whilst the I-PAM images demonstrate lighter areas in outward folds except for top edge which offers a flat surface.

Figure 17. 3D printed ceramic, interlocking hollow building block designs that feature an increased surface area and a large internal nutrient storage capacity. The designs present interlocking and reconfigurable units that add a level of flexibility within the building fabric. Work by Assia Crawford.

Figure 17. 3D printed ceramic, interlocking hollow building block designs that feature an increased surface area and a large internal nutrient storage capacity. The designs present interlocking and reconfigurable units that add a level of flexibility within the building fabric. Work by Assia Crawford.