Publication Cover
Automatika
Journal for Control, Measurement, Electronics, Computing and Communications
Volume 63, 2022 - Issue 4
1,065
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Papers

A periodic adaptive controller for the torque loop of variable speed brushless DC motor drives with non-ideal back-electromotive force

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 732-744 | Received 05 May 2021, Accepted 10 Apr 2022, Published online: 25 Apr 2022

Figures & data

Figure 1. Configuration of BLDC motor drive.

Figure 1. Configuration of BLDC motor drive.

Figure 2. Change of trapezoidal back-EMF signals and corresponding desired phase currents.

Figure 2. Change of trapezoidal back-EMF signals and corresponding desired phase currents.

Figure 3. Form of the back-EMF signals: fa(θe), fb(θe), fc(θe).

Figure 3. Form of the back-EMF signals: fa(θe), fb(θe), fc(θe).

Figure 4. Results of Sim #1: Proposed controller with q1=0.01 for ωr=750 rpm. (a) The change of the output torque (top), reference and real conducting phase currents (middle), conducting phase voltage (bottom) and (b) The change of the periodic adapted parameter and its reference (top), adapted constant parameters (middle and bottom).

Figure 4. Results of Sim #1: Proposed controller with q1=0.01 for ωr=750 rpm. (a) The change of the output torque (top), reference and real conducting phase currents (middle), conducting phase voltage (bottom) and (b) The change of the periodic adapted parameter and its reference (top), adapted constant parameters (middle and bottom).

Figure 5. Results of Sim #2: Proposed controller with q1=0.01 for ωr=1200 rpm. (a) The change of the output torque (top), reference and real conducting phase currents (middle), conducting phase voltage (bottom) and (b) The change of the periodic adapted parameter and its reference (top), adapted constant parameters (middle and bottom).

Figure 5. Results of Sim #2: Proposed controller with q1=0.01 for ωr=1200 rpm. (a) The change of the output torque (top), reference and real conducting phase currents (middle), conducting phase voltage (bottom) and (b) The change of the periodic adapted parameter and its reference (top), adapted constant parameters (middle and bottom).

Figure 6. Results of Sim #3: Proposed controller with q1=0.03 for ωr=750 rpm. (a) The change of the output torque (top), reference and real conducting phase currents (middle), conducting phase voltage (bottom) and (b) The change of the periodic adapted parameter and its reference (top), adapted constant parameters (middle and bottom).

Figure 6. Results of Sim #3: Proposed controller with q1=0.03 for ωr=750 rpm. (a) The change of the output torque (top), reference and real conducting phase currents (middle), conducting phase voltage (bottom) and (b) The change of the periodic adapted parameter and its reference (top), adapted constant parameters (middle and bottom).

Figure 7. Results for the controller without adaptation. (a) Sim #4 (ωr=750 rpm): The change of the output torque (top), reference and real conducting phase currents (middle), conducting phase voltage (bottom) and (b) Sim #5 (ωr=1200 rpm): The change of the output torque (top), reference and real conducting phase currents (middle), conducting phase voltage (bottom).

Figure 7. Results for the controller without adaptation. (a) Sim #4 (ωr=750 rpm): The change of the output torque (top), reference and real conducting phase currents (middle), conducting phase voltage (bottom) and (b) Sim #5 (ωr=1200 rpm): The change of the output torque (top), reference and real conducting phase currents (middle), conducting phase voltage (bottom).

Figure 8. The change of RMS values of the output torque and the conducting current along the adaptation periods for Sim #1–Sim #4. (a) Sim #1: RMS of the output torque (top), RMS of the conducting phase current (bottom). (b) Sim #2: RMS of the output torque (top), RMS of the conducting phase current (bottom). (c) Sim #3: RMS of the output torque (top), RMS of the conducting phase current (bottom) and (d) Sim #4: RMS of the output torque (top), RMS of the conducting phase current (bottom).

Figure 8. The change of RMS values of the output torque and the conducting current along the adaptation periods for Sim #1–Sim #4. (a) Sim #1: RMS of the output torque (top), RMS of the conducting phase current (bottom). (b) Sim #2: RMS of the output torque (top), RMS of the conducting phase current (bottom). (c) Sim #3: RMS of the output torque (top), RMS of the conducting phase current (bottom) and (d) Sim #4: RMS of the output torque (top), RMS of the conducting phase current (bottom).