Figures & data
Table 1. Summary of mode 1 and mode 2 process simulated results.
Figure 17. Point of common coupling voltage Vs, Grid current Is, Load current IL, Inverter Terminal current Ic.
![Figure 17. Point of common coupling voltage Vs, Grid current Is, Load current IL, Inverter Terminal current Ic.](/cms/asset/91d3aa63-b426-4318-b725-dd8e423b6193/taut_a_2203563_f0017_oc.jpg)
Figure 18. Point of common coupling voltage Vs, Grid current Is, Load current IL, Inverter Terminal current Ic.
![Figure 18. Point of common coupling voltage Vs, Grid current Is, Load current IL, Inverter Terminal current Ic.](/cms/asset/b60d3529-db75-4007-9632-39095aeae762/taut_a_2203563_f0018_oc.jpg)
Figure 19. Investigation of Voltage sag situations (a) Grid Voltage (b) Load Voltage (c) Injected Voltage.
![Figure 19. Investigation of Voltage sag situations (a) Grid Voltage (b) Load Voltage (c) Injected Voltage.](/cms/asset/782a6a37-f9d7-49b8-a7c0-e62560983576/taut_a_2203563_f0019_oc.jpg)
Figure 20. Investigation of Voltage swell situations (a) Grid Voltage (b) Load Voltage (c) Injected Voltage.
![Figure 20. Investigation of Voltage swell situations (a) Grid Voltage (b) Load Voltage (c) Injected Voltage.](/cms/asset/571d7176-164d-4f60-bd2d-51be0590d22e/taut_a_2203563_f0020_oc.jpg)
Figure 23. Suggested Reactive Power (Q) comparison between several existing optimization techniques.
![Figure 23. Suggested Reactive Power (Q) comparison between several existing optimization techniques.](/cms/asset/5a4e46e6-c8b5-4f35-b453-5dee2a4217fa/taut_a_2203563_f0023_oc.jpg)
Table 2. Harmonic order comparison between before and After UPQC compensation.
Table A1. Rule base for the proposed Membership Functions.
Table A2. Specifications of Solar, Wind, and Battery.