Figures & data
Figure 1. Map of the Bay of Biscay showing the area where the coastal counts were performed in the southeastern the Bay of Biscay.
![Figure 1. Map of the Bay of Biscay showing the area where the coastal counts were performed in the southeastern the Bay of Biscay.](/cms/asset/bc997c7a-8859-42de-b3b4-5fbb266279a3/tbis_a_1515177_f0001_ob.jpg)
Table 1. Mean (±se), range and total number of Gannets counted by hour and sampling day during the 3-hour survey period at each sampling cape and period (wintering, pre-breeding, breeding and post-breeding) within the Bay of Biscay, for the period 2006–15. The number of sampling hours is shown in parenthesis.
Table 2. Beta-parameter estimates (±se, P values) obtained from the best model used to predict coastal Gannet counts in the southeastern Bay of Biscay. Only significant parameter estimates are shown.
Figure 2. Mean (±se) number of Gannets counted by cape and four phenological periods. Grey bars represent the global mean number of counted Gannets for all four capes.
![Figure 2. Mean (±se) number of Gannets counted by cape and four phenological periods. Grey bars represent the global mean number of counted Gannets for all four capes.](/cms/asset/2a8574cd-86fb-4512-8827-5987b529514e/tbis_a_1515177_f0002_ob.jpg)
Figure 3. Gannet counts in the capes in relation to northwest-wind component values. Data from the four study capes have been pooled due to the lack of a significant cape × wind interaction ().
![Figure 3. Gannet counts in the capes in relation to northwest-wind component values. Data from the four study capes have been pooled due to the lack of a significant cape × wind interaction (Table 1).](/cms/asset/dfa35776-c22a-4e3b-b935-a18c766951b4/tbis_a_1515177_f0003_ob.jpg)
Figure 4. Relationship between relative humidity and Gannet counts at the capes. Relative humidity values were calculated for each count value (log x + 1) for each cape separately. The four capes are represented individually since there were differences in the relative humidity effect between the capes (P < 0.05).
![Figure 4. Relationship between relative humidity and Gannet counts at the capes. Relative humidity values were calculated for each count value (log x + 1) for each cape separately. The four capes are represented individually since there were differences in the relative humidity effect between the capes (P < 0.05).](/cms/asset/2b02283f-9e31-4861-998c-31611908d65f/tbis_a_1515177_f0004_ob.jpg)