413
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Weather effect on widely distributed seabirds through migration flyways: a case study with the Northern Gannet Morus bassanus in the Bay of Biscay

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 365-372 | Received 30 Oct 2017, Accepted 25 Apr 2018, Published online: 08 Oct 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. Map of the Bay of Biscay showing the area where the coastal counts were performed in the southeastern the Bay of Biscay.

Figure 1. Map of the Bay of Biscay showing the area where the coastal counts were performed in the southeastern the Bay of Biscay.

Table 1. Mean (±se), range and total number of Gannets counted by hour and sampling day during the 3-hour survey period at each sampling cape and period (wintering, pre-breeding, breeding and post-breeding) within the Bay of Biscay, for the period 2006–15. The number of sampling hours is shown in parenthesis.

Table 2. Beta-parameter estimates (±se, P values) obtained from the best model used to predict coastal Gannet counts in the southeastern Bay of Biscay. Only significant parameter estimates are shown.

Figure 2. Mean (±se) number of Gannets counted by cape and four phenological periods. Grey bars represent the global mean number of counted Gannets for all four capes.

Figure 2. Mean (±se) number of Gannets counted by cape and four phenological periods. Grey bars represent the global mean number of counted Gannets for all four capes.

Figure 3. Gannet counts in the capes in relation to northwest-wind component values. Data from the four study capes have been pooled due to the lack of a significant cape × wind interaction ().

Figure 3. Gannet counts in the capes in relation to northwest-wind component values. Data from the four study capes have been pooled due to the lack of a significant cape × wind interaction (Table 1).

Figure 4. Relationship between relative humidity and Gannet counts at the capes. Relative humidity values were calculated for each count value (log x + 1) for each cape separately. The four capes are represented individually since there were differences in the relative humidity effect between the capes (P < 0.05).

Figure 4. Relationship between relative humidity and Gannet counts at the capes. Relative humidity values were calculated for each count value (log x + 1) for each cape separately. The four capes are represented individually since there were differences in the relative humidity effect between the capes (P < 0.05).
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (1 MB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.