1,564
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The effects of geolocators on return rates, condition, and breeding success in Common Sandpipers Actitis hypoleucos

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 217-223 | Received 27 Mar 2020, Accepted 29 Jul 2020, Published online: 04 Sep 2020

Figures & data

Figure 1. Common Sandpipers carrying geolocators mounted parallel (left panel) and perpendicularly (right panel) to the leg. The bird in the left panel was tagged with a Lotek MK5040 geolocator in the UK; the bird in the right panel was tagged with a Migrate Technology Intigeo geolocator in Senegal.

Figure 1. Common Sandpipers carrying geolocators mounted parallel (left panel) and perpendicularly (right panel) to the leg. The bird in the left panel was tagged with a Lotek MK5040 geolocator in the UK; the bird in the right panel was tagged with a Migrate Technology Intigeo geolocator in Senegal.

Table 1. The effects of (a) carrying a geolocator compared with colour rings only and (b) carrying a geolocator mounted parallel or perpendicularly to the leg on: return rate, return date, change in body condition and hatching and fledging success in the year of attachment and year of recapture. The raw proportions and the standard errors (se) are in brackets. OR is the Odds Ratio statistic from the Fisher’s exact test.