Figures & data
Tableau 1. Explications des conclusions qualitatives
Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal
Volume 52, 2019 - Issue 3
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Expert evidence and forensic misconceptions of the nature of exact science
Source:
Elsevier BV
Forensic likelihood ratio: Statistical problems and pitfalls
Source:
Elsevier BV
Equal prior probabilities: can one do any better?
Source:
Elsevier BV
Aitken/Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists
Source:
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Taroni/Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Inference in Forensic Science
Source:
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Bayes factor for investigative assessment of selected handwriting features
Source:
Elsevier BV
Evidence evaluation: A response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T
Source:
Elsevier BV
The need for reporting standards in forensic science
Source:
Oxford University Press (OUP)
On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the weak evidence effect
Source:
Elsevier BV
Identification, individualization and uniqueness: What's the difference?
Source:
Oxford University Press (OUP)
The scientist and the Scales of Justice
Source:
Elsevier BV
Case pre-assessment and review in a two-way transfer case
Source:
Elsevier BV
Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems
Source:
Elsevier BV
Discussion on how to implement a verbal scale in a forensic laboratory: Benefits, pitfalls and suggestions to avoid misunderstandings.
Source:
Elsevier BV
Inadequacies of posterior probabilities for the assessment of scientific evidence
Source:
Oxford University Press (OUP)
The Search for Certainty and the Uses of Probability
Source:
ASTM International
A Bayesian Decision Perspective
Source:
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework
Source:
Elsevier BV
Scale of conclusions for the value of evidence
Source:
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Analysis and evaluation of magnetism of black toners on documents printed by electrophotographic systems
Source:
Elsevier BV
Handwriting and Signatures, Interpretation of Comparison Results
Source:
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Score-based likelihood ratios for handwriting evidence.
Source:
Elsevier BV
What is the probability that this blood came from that person? A meaningful question?
Source:
Elsevier BV
On meaningful questions: a two-trace transfer problem
Source:
Elsevier BV
Two Items of Evidence, No Putative Source: An Inference Problem in Forensic Intelligence
Source:
Wiley
The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions
Source:
Elsevier BV
Expressing evaluative opinions: a position statement.
Source:
Elsevier BV
Verbal conventions for handwriting opinions.
Source:
ASTM International
Learning about Bayesian networks for forensic interpretation: An example based on the ‘the problem of multiple propositions’
Source:
Elsevier BV
Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion
Source:
Elsevier BV
Letter to the Editor
Source:
Informa UK Limited
A two-level model for evidence evaluation.
Source:
Wiley
Linking provided by
