474
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

First lessons regarding the data analysis of gunshot residue traces at activity level in TTADB

, , , , &
Pages 196-209 | Received 19 Oct 2020, Accepted 14 Nov 2021, Published online: 29 Nov 2021
 

Abstract

Gunshot residues (GSR) are of interest whenever a crime involves the discharge of a firearm. They do not only inform about their source, but also about the suspect’s implication. In order to assess the existing knowledge on GSR in the literature and contribute to the creation of a structured database on transfer traces at the activity level, studies focusing on transfer, persistence, background, population and detection of GSR in various scenarios and on different supports were analyzed, with a critical assessment in a Canadian context. This research establishes a review of the current knowledge identifies gaps in the literature and therefore suggests future research to be undertaken.

RÉSUMÉ

Les résidus de tir sont d’intérêt chaque fois qu’un crime implique la décharge d’une arme à feu. Ils peuvent non seulement informer sur leur source, mais aussi sur l’implication du suspect. Afin d’évaluer l’état des connaissances sur les résidus de tir et de contribuer à la création d’une base de données structurée sur les traces de transfert au niveau de l’activité, des études axées sur le transfert, la persistance, le bruit de fond, la population et la détection des résidus de tirs, dans divers scénarios et avec différents supports, ont été analysées avec une évaluation critique dans un contexte canadien. Cette recherche offre une revue des connaissances actuelles, identifie de potentielles lacunes dans la littérature et suggère de futures recherches à entreprendre.

Acknowledgments

The authors would sincerely like to thank Ms Linda Vézina, firearms examiner at the Laboratoire de sciences judiciaires et de médecine légale in Montreal, for her contribution and support in the thinking process on the state of knowledge on GSR.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest is reported by the authors.

Funding

This work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) under Grant number 430-2016-00051 and 430-2018-00641, from June 1st, 2018 to May 31st, 2022.

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Notes

1 The ScienceDirectTM platform offers, following consultation of an article, a series of similar or cited articles that could be of interest to the reader.

2 All data analyzed in this article can be found in the .csv spreadsheet (under .xlsx format) joined as supplemental material in the study by Cadola et al. [Citation11]. Only the online TTADB will be continuously updated in the future, accessible at the following address: http://www.uqtr.ca/LRC/BDATT-TTADB.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 102.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.