Figures & data
Table 1. Localities and voucher specimens of Allium taxa examined in the present study.
Figure 1 Somatic chromosomes in the studied taxa. (a) Allium arlgirdense; (b) A. anacoleum; (c) A. microspathum; (d) A. rhetoreanum; (e) A. shirnakense; (f) A. oreophilum. Scale bars 10 μm.
![Figure 1 Somatic chromosomes in the studied taxa. (a) Allium arlgirdense; (b) A. anacoleum; (c) A. microspathum; (d) A. rhetoreanum; (e) A. shirnakense; (f) A. oreophilum. Scale bars 10 μm.](/cms/asset/d7b8a4f8-d091-4f00-a4d6-8774034561ca/tcar_a_1152114_f0001_oc.gif)
Figure 2 Haploid ideograms in the studied taxa. (a) Allium arlgirdense; (b) A. anacoleum; (c) A. microspathum; (d) A. rhetoreanum; (e) A. shirnakense; (f) A. oreophilum.
![Figure 2 Haploid ideograms in the studied taxa. (a) Allium arlgirdense; (b) A. anacoleum; (c) A. microspathum; (d) A. rhetoreanum; (e) A. shirnakense; (f) A. oreophilum.](/cms/asset/35a1004e-7442-4a9d-850b-55eb97078827/tcar_a_1152114_f0002_b.gif)
Table 2. Karyotype formula according to Levan et al. (Citation1964) and characteristics of the investigated taxa.
Table 3. Karyo-morphometric parameters and symmetry indices for the investigated taxa.
Figure 3 Scatter plot for the investigated taxa reported in Table : (a) against A2 (x axis) and A1 (y axis); (b) against CVCL (x axis) and CVCI (y axis); (c) against MCA (x axis) and CVCL (y axis); (d) against MCA (x axis) and CVCI (y axis).
![Figure 3 Scatter plot for the investigated taxa reported in Table 3: (a) against A2 (x axis) and A1 (y axis); (b) against CVCL (x axis) and CVCI (y axis); (c) against MCA (x axis) and CVCL (y axis); (d) against MCA (x axis) and CVCI (y axis).](/cms/asset/7085cd6a-9992-404c-9b4d-b93a22814189/tcar_a_1152114_f0003_oc.gif)