Abstract
A comparative study is presented of the impact of chemistry modeling on the behavior of 2 micro-mixing models in transported scalar PDF simulations of turbulent non-premixed flames. The micro-mixing models are CD (modified Curl's Coalescence/Dispersion) and EMST (Euclidean Minimum Spanning Tree). A first order non-linear k-ε turbulence model is applied for the turbulent flow and mixing fields. Three C1 chemistry models are considered: 2 skeletal schemes containing 16 species and 31, resp. 41 elementary reactions, and one augmented reaction scheme (ARM), consisting of 9 independent species and 5 global reaction steps. The test cases considered are the piloted turbulent Delft Flame III jet diffusion flame and the bluff-body stabilized turbulent non-premixed Sydney HM1 flame. With EMST the chemistry model choice has a negligible effect on the micro-mixing model behavior or on the results in physical space. With CD on the other hand, larger differences appear.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The first author is Postdoctoral Fellow of the Fund of Scientific Research – Flanders (Belgium) (FWO-Vlaanderen). Part of the research was financed by the Fund of Scientific Research – Flanders (Belgium) (FWO-Vlaanderen) through FWO-project G.0070.03.
This collaborative research was supported by the Spanish MEC under Project #ENE2005-09190-C04-04/CON.