1,879
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Lean Flame Root Dynamics in a Gas Turbine Model Combustor

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1019-1042 | Received 14 Oct 2018, Accepted 14 Feb 2019, Published online: 07 Apr 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1. Schematic drawing of the gas turbine model combustor (Meier et al., Citation2006; Weigand et al., Citation2006).

Figure 1. Schematic drawing of the gas turbine model combustor (Meier et al., Citation2006; Weigand et al., Citation2006).

Table 1. Operating conditions for flame C (Meier et al., Citation2006; Weigand et al., Citation2006).

Figure 2. Compuational grid for the gas turbine model combustor (a) and histograms of the normalised filter width distribution (b), where the cell samples are collected within the reaction region marked using ω˙>0.

Figure 2. Compuational grid for the gas turbine model combustor (a) and histograms of the normalised filter width distribution (b), where the cell samples are collected within the reaction region marked using ω˙∗‾>0.

Figure 3. Distributions of the (a) axial velocity and (b) temperature fields for flame C. The filtered and averaged, in both time and the azimuthal direction, variations are shown on the left- and right-hand sides respectively. The corresponding streamlines are also shown.

Figure 3. Distributions of the (a) axial velocity and (b) temperature fields for flame C. The filtered and averaged, in both time and the azimuthal direction, variations are shown on the left- and right-hand sides respectively. The corresponding streamlines are also shown.

Figure 4. Comparisons of the time-averaged (a) axial and (b) radial and azimuthal velocities between the measurements (Meier et al., Citation2006; Weigand et al., Citation2006) (symbols) and the computations (lines), where the latter results are azimuthally averaged.

Figure 4. Comparisons of the time-averaged (a) axial and (b) radial and azimuthal velocities between the measurements (Meier et al., Citation2006; Weigand et al., Citation2006) (symbols) and the computations (lines), where the latter results are azimuthally averaged.

Figure 5. Comparisons of the time-averaged (a) axial and (b) radial and azimuthal rms velocities between the measurements (Meier et al., Citation2006; Weigand et al., Citation2006) (symbols) and the computations (lines), where the latter results are azimuthally averaged.

Figure 5. Comparisons of the time-averaged (a) axial and (b) radial and azimuthal rms velocities between the measurements (Meier et al., Citation2006; Weigand et al., Citation2006) (symbols) and the computations (lines), where the latter results are azimuthally averaged.

Figure 6. Comparisons of the time-averaged (a) mixture fraction and (b) temperature profiles between the measurements (Meier et al., Citation2006; Weigand et al., Citation2006) (symbols) and the computations (lines), where the latter results are azimuthally averaged.

Figure 6. Comparisons of the time-averaged (a) mixture fraction and (b) temperature profiles between the measurements (Meier et al., Citation2006; Weigand et al., Citation2006) (symbols) and the computations (lines), where the latter results are azimuthally averaged.

Figure 7. Comparisons of the time-averaged (a) rms mixture fraction and (b) rms temperature profiles between the measurements (Meier et al., Citation2006; Weigand et al., Citation2006) (symbols) and the computations (lines), where the latter results are azimuthally averaged.

Figure 7. Comparisons of the time-averaged (a) rms mixture fraction and (b) rms temperature profiles between the measurements (Meier et al., Citation2006; Weigand et al., Citation2006) (symbols) and the computations (lines), where the latter results are azimuthally averaged.

Figure 8. Distributions of the (a) filtered and (b) time-averaged heat release rate fields on the xy mid-plane.

Figure 8. Distributions of the (a) filtered and (b) time-averaged heat release rate fields on the x–y mid-plane.

Figure 9. Time series of the (a) volume integrated heat release rate in the combustion chamber and within the marked volume in and (b) the lift-off height above the fuel nozzle.

Figure 9. Time series of the (a) volume integrated heat release rate in the combustion chamber and within the marked volume in Figure 8 and (b) the lift-off height above the fuel nozzle.

Figure 10. Time series of the simultaneous (a) filtered reaction rate and velocity vectors (coloured by magnitude) and (b) PIV and OH–PLIF measurements for the flame in Stage 1.

Figure 10. Time series of the simultaneous (a) filtered reaction rate and velocity vectors (coloured by magnitude) and (b) PIV and OH–PLIF measurements for the flame in Stage 1.

Figure 11. Time series of the simultaneous (a) filtered reaction rate and velocity arrows (coloured by magnitude) and (b) the PIV and OH–PLIF measurements for the event showing the loss of the flame root and local extinction.

Figure 11. Time series of the simultaneous (a) filtered reaction rate and velocity arrows (coloured by magnitude) and (b) the PIV and OH–PLIF measurements for the event showing the loss of the flame root and local extinction.

Figure 12. Distributions of the (a) filtered mixture fraction and (b) reaction rate for the flame in Stage 1 at t = 104.525 ms. The isolines denote the stoichiometric mixture fraction value of ξst=0.055.

Figure 12. Distributions of the (a) filtered mixture fraction and (b) reaction rate for the flame in Stage 1 at t = 104.525 ms. The isolines denote the stoichiometric mixture fraction value of ξst=0.055.

Figure 13. Distributions of the (a) filtered mixture fraction and (b) reaction rate prior to the lift-off event at t=108.05ms. The frames (c) and (d) respectively show the filtered mixture fraction and reaction rate at t=111.05ms.

Figure 13. Distributions of the (a) filtered mixture fraction and (b) reaction rate prior to the lift-off event at t=108.05ms. The frames (c) and (d) respectively show the filtered mixture fraction and reaction rate at t=111.05ms.

Figure 14. Distributions of the (a) filtered mixture fraction and (b) reaction rate for the flame at the maximum lift-off height (t=138.5ms).

Figure 14. Distributions of the (a) filtered mixture fraction and (b) reaction rate for the flame at the maximum lift-off height (t=138.5ms).