Figures & data
Figure 1. Experimental conditions of soot and species measurements for fuel-rich CH4 combustion near atmospheric pressure operated by various methods: burner stabilized flames (Ahmed et al. Citation2016; Alfè et al. Citation2010; Castaldi, Vincitore, Senkan Citation1995; Li et al. Citation2012; Marinov et al. Citation1996; Melton, Vincitore, Senkan Citation1998; Xu and Faeth Citation2000); jet-stirred reactor (Le Cong and Dagaut Citation2008); plug-flow reactors (Köhler et al. Citation2016; Skjøth-Rasmussen et al. Citation2004); and a micro flow reactor with a controlled temperature profile (this study).
![Figure 1. Experimental conditions of soot and species measurements for fuel-rich CH4 combustion near atmospheric pressure operated by various methods: burner stabilized flames (Ahmed et al. Citation2016; Alfè et al. Citation2010; Castaldi, Vincitore, Senkan Citation1995; Li et al. Citation2012; Marinov et al. Citation1996; Melton, Vincitore, Senkan Citation1998; Xu and Faeth Citation2000); jet-stirred reactor (Le Cong and Dagaut Citation2008); plug-flow reactors (Köhler et al. Citation2016; Skjøth-Rasmussen et al. Citation2004); and a micro flow reactor with a controlled temperature profile (this study).](/cms/asset/d790a06d-328b-450b-b9ac-c80a84ffd294/gcst_a_1787394_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Schematic and direct image (Dubey et al. Citation2016) of flame and soot observation in MFR.
![Figure 2. Schematic and direct image (Dubey et al. Citation2016) of flame and soot observation in MFR.](/cms/asset/6e424d69-aee4-46f8-a32c-f9361ee5b899/gcst_a_1787394_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Benzene production as a function of maximum wall temperature at Ø = 6.0 in MFR. See following sections for experimental and computational methods.
![Figure 3. Benzene production as a function of maximum wall temperature at Ø = 6.0 in MFR. See following sections for experimental and computational methods.](/cms/asset/1588424d-7ff3-48bc-a4e5-9616a8ee0a30/gcst_a_1787394_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Schematic of experimental setup. The temperature profile shown in the figure was measured in experiments and used in computations.
![Figure 4. Schematic of experimental setup. The temperature profile shown in the figure was measured in experiments and used in computations.](/cms/asset/5dbb19b1-bcf7-4247-93a2-ddf6f4649b3f/gcst_a_1787394_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Measured (open square) and computed (circle with line) mole fractions of O2, H2, C1–C2 and aromatic species for CH4/air mixtures at Ø = 1.7–6.0 (fuel-to-mixture ratio of 15–38 mol.%) and Tw,max = 1300 K.
![Figure 5. Measured (open square) and computed (circle with line) mole fractions of O2, H2, C1–C2 and aromatic species for CH4/air mixtures at Ø = 1.7–6.0 (fuel-to-mixture ratio of 15–38 mol.%) and Tw,max = 1300 K.](/cms/asset/df98e771-0b25-4f4d-91f8-9f2bd4356438/gcst_a_1787394_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 6. C2H2 prediction performed by various chemical kinetics: KAUST (Selvaraj et al. Citation2016), Jin (Jin et al. Citation2017) and CRECK (CRECK Modeling Group, Politecnico di Milano Citation2014) as mechanisms including PAH growth; AramcoMech 1.3 (Metcalfe et al. Citation2013), San Diego mechanism (Citation2016) (San Diego Mechanism web page, University of California at San Diego Citation2016), HP-Mech (Yang et al. Citation2017) and FFCM-1 (Smith, Tao, Wang Citation2016) as non-PAH mechanisms. Black long broken line shows the mole fraction of measured benzene by a factor of 3.
![Figure 6. C2H2 prediction performed by various chemical kinetics: KAUST (Selvaraj et al. Citation2016), Jin (Jin et al. Citation2017) and CRECK (CRECK Modeling Group, Politecnico di Milano Citation2014) as mechanisms including PAH growth; AramcoMech 1.3 (Metcalfe et al. Citation2013), San Diego mechanism (Citation2016) (San Diego Mechanism web page, University of California at San Diego Citation2016), HP-Mech (Yang et al. Citation2017) and FFCM-1 (Smith, Tao, Wang Citation2016) as non-PAH mechanisms. Black long broken line shows the mole fraction of measured benzene by a factor of 3.](/cms/asset/c0f8ba14-2e0d-4bc5-a299-025c7e99a671/gcst_a_1787394_f0006_oc.jpg)
Figure 7. First order, A-factor sensitivity coefficients for C2H2 mole fraction at Ø = 1.7, 4.0 and 6.0 performed with (a) Jin and (b) HP-Mech. Top 10 sensitive reactions at location of maximum rate of C2H2 production for each condition are shown.
![Figure 7. First order, A-factor sensitivity coefficients for C2H2 mole fraction at Ø = 1.7, 4.0 and 6.0 performed with (a) Jin and (b) HP-Mech. Top 10 sensitive reactions at location of maximum rate of C2H2 production for each condition are shown.](/cms/asset/cd69978f-0cbb-4c66-86a4-66ba713bda1e/gcst_a_1787394_f0007_b.gif)
Table 1. Reactions of C2H3 +O2=products included in the mechanisms
Figure 8. Reaction pathways of benzene formation analysed with (a) KAUST and (b) Jin at a maximum rate of benzene production, and Ø = 2.0 and 6.0. Numbers in parenthesis are percent contribution to production of benzene, toluene and styrene. The measured species are shown in boxes.
![Figure 8. Reaction pathways of benzene formation analysed with (a) KAUST and (b) Jin at a maximum rate of benzene production, and Ø = 2.0 and 6.0. Numbers in parenthesis are percent contribution to production of benzene, toluene and styrene. The measured species are shown in boxes.](/cms/asset/20b20ad4-2a22-4b36-bc6d-f967b30f15b5/gcst_a_1787394_f0008_oc.jpg)
Figure 9. Profiles of typical radicals for CH4/air mixtures at Ø = 6.0 computed with KAUST (red lines) and Jin (blue lines).
![Figure 9. Profiles of typical radicals for CH4/air mixtures at Ø = 6.0 computed with KAUST (red lines) and Jin (blue lines).](/cms/asset/42ab6cf3-ce54-498c-a5aa-8a406c36b3bc/gcst_a_1787394_f0009_oc.jpg)