Drinking‐Water Treatment Residual Effects on the Phosphorus Status of Field Soils Amended with Biosolids, Manure, and Fertilizer

Abstract

Concerns about surface water pollution with phosphorus (P) from biosolids and manures are prompting land application guidelines that limit residual application rates to those based on crop‐P removals (typically, no more than 2 Mg ha⁻¹). Such rates are so low that the beneficial recycling of residuals is seriously threatened. Greater application rates [i.e., nitrogen (N) based] require judicious selection of residuals (low soluble P contents) and/or soil amendments, such as drinking‐water treatment residuals (WTRs) to control soluble P concentration. Although in the short term, WTR is effective in reducing soluble P levels, field studies to evaluate the stability of WTR‐immobilized P are scarce. The initial objective of this study was to determine the effects of WTR on P losses to surface and groundwater from Florida sand amended with different P sources (biosolids, manure, and inorganic fertilizer) applied at P‐ and N‐based rates. However, this objective could not be pursued to its logical conclusion because of severe flooding of the field 17 months after amendment application. The flooding appears to have compromised the treatments (moved soil and associated amendments across plots), which forced early termination of the experiment. Measurements taken after the flooding, however, provided a unique opportunity to assess the usefulness of WTR in controlling P solubility following severe flooding of WTR‐amended plots. Soluble P values measured from WTR‐amended A horizon plots were significantly lower than the plots without WTR amendment throughout the study. Phosphorus‐specific measurements in the Bh horizon suggest that excessive P leaching apparently occurred in the plots without WTR amendment and the control plots, whereas very little or no P leaching occurred in the WTR‐amended plots. Thus, despite extensive hurricane‐induced flooding of the fields, the WTR was able immobilize P and prevent excessive P leaching. We conclude that WTR could reduce offsite P transport, which will lower P loads into nutrient‐sensitive surface water systems, and that WTR‐immobilized P is stable even under severe flooding conditions.

Keywords:

• Degree of P saturation
• drinking‐water treatment residuals
• iron strip–extractable P
• P saturation index
• water‐extractable P

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by USEPA Research Grant CP‐82963801 and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). We express appreciation to M. L. Silveira of University of Florida and K. C. Makris of University of Texas, San Antonio, for their assistance.