ABSTRACT
Soil color patterns are essential to understand hydrologic regime and biogeochemical processes in wetland ecosystems. Munsell Soil Color Chart (MSCC) has been traditionally and predominantly used to identify and quantify hydric soil field indicators, but several simple, low-cost alternatives have become recently available to compare their efficacy in complementing the MSCC in soil color assessment. We conducted an intensive literature review on studies utilizing different methods to identify and quantify hydric soil colors and associated patterns; these include 1) the MSCC, 2) the Nix Color Sensor, 3) mobile phone camera (MPC) and medium-end digital camera photography, and 4) colorimetry and spectrometry. A review of these methods elucidates their respective strengths and weaknesses and highlights the importance of considering study-specific attributes in determining which method to choose for field studies of hydric soil colors. Redoximorphic features (RMFs) require methods capable of capturing small and heterogeneous soil surfaces and features such that the MSCC and digital photography are the most appropriate methods; on the other hand, the Nix Color Sensor provides rapid assessment of soil color that does not necessitate rigorous training to overcome biases that might come about in more subjective methods such as the MSCC. Overall, all alternative methods reviewed have their own merits and capacity to complement measurements made by the MSCC.
Acknowledgments
The study was part of the Dirt Project designed by Changwoo Ahn that was presented at INTECOL (International Congress of Ecology) symposium in 2017 titled “Symposium on Interdisciplinary Collaboration Among Ecological Engineering, EcoScience, and Eco-Art to Enhance Ecological Restoration Research, sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF, award number 1713756).