964
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Finnish university students’ views of different relationships in first-year engineering mathematics courses

, , &
Pages 2516-2531 | Received 14 Jun 2020, Published online: 10 Mar 2021

Figures & data

Table 1. Degree programmes and sign-ups of engineering mathematics courses at Tampere University.

Table 2. Student distribution in the various courses.

Table 3. Frequencies of students who had visited Math Shack and those who had not and the courses they were enrolled in, and also SiM–Sign-ups ratio for the courses.

Figure 1. Example drawings of all categories: (1) Everyone is equal; (2) Assistant as a teacher; (3) Assistant among students; (4) Assistant as a middleman; (5) Student-centred view; and (6) Assistant’s role is small.

Figure 1. Example drawings of all categories: (1) Everyone is equal; (2) Assistant as a teacher; (3) Assistant among students; (4) Assistant as a middleman; (5) Student-centred view; and (6) Assistant’s role is small.

Table 4. How students and teaching staff see the assistant’s role compared with that of the teacher and students in the first-year mathematics course.

Figure 2. Example drawings of categories: (1) Coaches as assistants, (2) Coaches are closer to students than assistants are, (3) Assistants are closer to students than coaches are, and (4) Coaches among students.

Figure 2. Example drawings of categories: (1) Coaches as assistants, (2) Coaches are closer to students than assistants are, (3) Assistants are closer to students than coaches are, and (4) Coaches among students.

Table 5. How students in Math Shack saw coaches compared with assistants.