396
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Exploring the role of students’ views of creativity on feeling creative

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 151-164 | Received 20 Apr 2021, Published online: 13 Aug 2021
 

Abstract

Creativity is crucial for doing mathematics, yet many United States students may not have opportunities to experience it in their courses. Moreover, the literature base on views of mathematical creativity lacks the student perspective. To explore the connections between views of and feeling creative, we examine differences in views of creativity between students who felt creative and did not feel creative in an interventional Calculus I course. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 37 undergraduate students taking a creativity-based Calculus I course across the United States, for their views on creativity and whether they felt creative in the course. Approximately three quarters felt creative (n = 27), while one quarter of students (n = 10) did not. Using qualitative coding, we found that students who did not feel creative were more likely to view creativity as including understanding and applications. In contrast, students who felt creative were more likely to view creativity as originality and actions and attitudes they could take. We recommend instructors take actions focusing on originality and actions and attitudes to help foster students’ creativity. Finally, we discuss how all ten students who did not feel creative came from groups that have been historically marginalized in mathematics.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr Gail Tang as a Principal Investigator of our research team and contributor of a key idea in the article.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers 1836369 and 1836371. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 372.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.