Figures & data
Table 1. The top 10 OM journals as ranked in 15 prior studies.
Table 2. Quality scores and ranks for 32 OM-related journals as provided in 15 prior studies.
Table 3. DEA efficiencies for the unconstrained model.
Table 4. Weights used in the weight-constrained DEA models for varying values of S (number of studies ranking a journal).
Table 5. DEA efficiencies of 32 OM journals (sorted by DEA efficiencies using a weight ratio of 1).
Table 6. Sensitivity of journal ranks to changes in weight ratios (sorted by rankings at each of the weight ratios).
Figure 1 DEA efficiency vs. weight ratio for eight OR journals.
Figure 2 DEA efficiency vs. weight ratio for six MGT journals.
Figure 3 DEA efficiency vs. weight ratio for four Interdisciplinary journals.
Figure 4 DEA efficiency vs. weight ratio for five ENG journals.
Figure 5 DEA efficiency vs. weight ratio for nine OM journals.
Table 7. Ranking of 32 OM journals for varying weight ratios (sorted by rankings at a weight ratio of 10).
Figure 6 DEA efficiency vs. weight ratio for the top 10 journals.
Table
