3,038
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Cost modelling of onboard cobot-supported item sorting in a picking system

, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 3269-3284 | Received 30 Jan 2020, Accepted 06 Nov 2020, Published online: 26 Dec 2020

Figures & data

Table 1. Notations and example values.

Figure 1. Overview of the manual sorting mode (top) and the cobot sorting mode (bottom).

Figure 1. Overview of the manual sorting mode (top) and the cobot sorting mode (bottom).

Table 2. Example of a pick list for one order.

Table 3. Example of a batch pick list for a setup with B=8, qs=1.

Table 4. Equipment related costs associated with the two modes.

Table 5. Types and example values of error correction costs.

Table 6. Example values for error probabilities.

Figure 2. Main cost components in €/year (logarithmic scale) of the two modes with respect to operator cost (left), equipment cost (middle), and quality cost (right). Boxes represent average cost and standard deviation. Bracketed lines represent maximum and minimum cost.

Figure 2. Main cost components in €/year (logarithmic scale) of the two modes with respect to operator cost (left), equipment cost (middle), and quality cost (right). Boxes represent average cost and standard deviation. Bracketed lines represent maximum and minimum cost.

Figure 3. Main effect plot of ΔCtot, showing effect size (vertical axis) and factor levels (horizontal axis) for the considered factors.

Figure 3. Main effect plot of ΔCtot, showing effect size (vertical axis) and factor levels (horizontal axis) for the considered factors.

Figure 4. Interaction plot with respect to ΔCtot, showing size of interaction effects (vertical axis) and the factor levels used for each parameter (horizontal axis).

Figure 4. Interaction plot with respect to ΔCtot, showing size of interaction effects (vertical axis) and the factor levels used for each parameter (horizontal axis).

Figure 5. Relative cost difference between the manual sorting mode and the cobot sorting mode with respect to nd (vertical axis) and qs (horizontal axis) under different levels of μs and δl. Grey areas indicate a more profitable manual sorting mode and white areas indicate a more profitable cobot sorting mode.

Figure 5. Relative cost difference between the manual sorting mode and the cobot sorting mode with respect to nd (vertical axis) and qs (horizontal axis) under different levels of μs and δl. Grey areas indicate a more profitable manual sorting mode and white areas indicate a more profitable cobot sorting mode.

Figure 6. The average number of picking units required in mode 1 and 2 with respect to nd (vertical axis) and qs (horizontal axis) under different levels of μs and δl. Grey circle without border indicate the average number of picking units required with mode 1, and hollow circle with border indicate the average number of picking units required with mode 2.

Figure 6. The average number of picking units required in mode 1 and 2 with respect to nd (vertical axis) and qs (horizontal axis) under different levels of μs and δl. Grey circle without border indicate the average number of picking units required with mode 1, and hollow circle with border indicate the average number of picking units required with mode 2.