1,687
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research papers

Effect of inclined jet screen on turbidity current

, &
Pages 81-90 | Received 19 Aug 2009, Published online: 18 Mar 2010

Figures & data

Figure 1 Screen of upward inclined water jets as technical measure to control turbidity currents and location of sediment deposits in reservoir

Figure 1 Screen of upward inclined water jets as technical measure to control turbidity currents and location of sediment deposits in reservoir

Figure 2 Schematic view of experimental installation with

test flume with jet screen and downstream weir,
constant head stilling box with gate and tranquilizer outlet,
mixing tank and
outlet tank with sediment filter

Figure 2 Schematic view of experimental installation with Display full size test flume with jet screen and downstream weir, Display full size constant head stilling box with gate and tranquilizer outlet, Display full size mixing tank and Display full size outlet tank with sediment filter

Figure 3 (a) Flume inlet with tranquilizer box, (b) water jet injection apparatus, (c) UVP transducer, bottom (small dots) and longitudinal reference electrodes for sediment layer thickness measurements

Figure 3 (a) Flume inlet with tranquilizer box, (b) water jet injection apparatus, (c) UVP transducer, bottom (small dots) and longitudinal reference electrodes for sediment layer thickness measurements

Table 1 Experimental parameters of turbidity currents influenced by inclined jet screen (series E) and for comparison with Test A06 involving comparable initial conditions than Test E01, h 0 is equal to gate opening of 4.5 cm

Table 2 Test parameters of inclined jet diffuser

Table 3 Characteristics of inclined jet screen related to approach flow turbidity currents

Figure 4 Locations of five velocity profiles taken using UVP transducers, with dimensions in (m)

Figure 4 Locations of five velocity profiles taken using UVP transducers, with dimensions in (m)

Figure 5 Physical modelling of turbidity current flowing down incline of S o  = 4.64%, passing through 45° upward inclined water jet screen, at t = 140 s (Test E01, see also ), resulting in a bore propagating upstream

Figure 5 Physical modelling of turbidity current flowing down incline of S o  = 4.64%, passing through 45° upward inclined water jet screen, at t = 140 s (Test E01, see also Fig. 9), resulting in a bore propagating upstream

Figure 6 Sequence of turbidity current flowing through inclined jet screen, time intervals 10 s, Test E04

Figure 6 Sequence of turbidity current flowing through inclined jet screen, time intervals 10 s, Test E04

Figure 7 Vertical velocity profiles of turbidity current for Test A06 (a)–(f), continuous turbidity current without obstacle and Test E01 (g)–(k), with jet screen at x = 515 cm

Figure 7 Vertical velocity profiles of turbidity current for Test A06 (a)–(f), continuous turbidity current without obstacle and Test E01 (g)–(k), with jet screen at x = 515 cm

Figure 8 Evolution of non-dimensional turbidity current (□) velocity U/U 0 and (Δ) height h/h 0 along flume up- and downstream of jet screen for E series. For comparison, the values for Test A06 are also shown. Lines for E series represent average of all height and velocity data, respectively

Figure 8 Evolution of non-dimensional turbidity current (□) velocity U/U 0 and (Δ) height h/h 0 along flume up- and downstream of jet screen for E series. For comparison, the values for Test A06 are also shown. Lines for E series represent average of all height and velocity data, respectively

Figure 9 Measured turbidity current front positions of series E with jet screen at x = 515 cm. Test E01 had a clearly defined reflection bore, Test E02 was completely blocked by jet screen, Tests E03 and E04 went through the screen with a slight decrease in velocity

Figure 9 Measured turbidity current front positions of series E with jet screen at x = 515 cm. Test E01 had a clearly defined reflection bore, Test E02 was completely blocked by jet screen, Tests E03 and E04 went through the screen with a slight decrease in velocity

Figure 10 Measured evolution of sediment deposit of turbidity current partially blocked by 45° upward inclined water jet screen, Test (a) E01 and (b) E03. Note the considerable reduction of downstream sediment deposit depth d b (in log scale)

Figure 10 Measured evolution of sediment deposit of turbidity current partially blocked by 45° upward inclined water jet screen, Test (a) E01 and (b) E03. Note the considerable reduction of downstream sediment deposit depth d b (in log scale)

Figure 11 Comparison of ratios q s /q s0 for (a) Test E01 with a sloping bottom and (b) Test E03 with a horizontal bottom

Figure 11 Comparison of ratios q s /q s0 for (a) Test E01 with a sloping bottom and (b) Test E03 with a horizontal bottom

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.