621
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Design and evaluation of gaseous tritium recovery system using commercially available membrane type dehumidifier

, , &
Pages 1018-1027 | Received 25 Apr 2012, Accepted 08 Aug 2012, Published online: 18 Sep 2012

Figures & data

Figure 1. System flow of test apparatus.

Figure 1. System flow of test apparatus.

Table 1. Operating conditions.

Figure 2. Transitional change of the dew point under PID control operation.

Figure 2. Transitional change of the dew point under PID control operation.

Figure 3. Transitional change of the dew point under fixed purge ratio operation at (1) 0.6 MPa(G) and (2) 0.8 MPa(G).

Figure 3. Transitional change of the dew point under fixed purge ratio operation at (1) 0.6 MPa(G) and (2) 0.8 MPa(G).

Figure 4. Transitional change of the dew point under optimal fixed purge ratio operation.

Figure 4. Transitional change of the dew point under optimal fixed purge ratio operation.

Figure 5. Detailed transitional change of the dew point upon an increase in purge gas flow rate (1) with overshooting and (2) without overshooting.

Figure 5. Detailed transitional change of the dew point upon an increase in purge gas flow rate (1) with overshooting and (2) without overshooting.

Figure 6. Detailed transitional change of the dew point upon an increase in purge gas flow rate (1) with undershooting and (2) without undershooting.

Figure 6. Detailed transitional change of the dew point upon an increase in purge gas flow rate (1) with undershooting and (2) without undershooting.

Figure 7. Differential model for membrane dehumidifier module.

Figure 7. Differential model for membrane dehumidifier module.

Figure 8. Relationship between dew point and purge ratio at (1) 0.6 MPa(G), (2) 0.7 MPa(G), and (3) 0.8 MPa(G).

Figure 8. Relationship between dew point and purge ratio at (1) 0.6 MPa(G), (2) 0.7 MPa(G), and (3) 0.8 MPa(G).

Figure 9. Relationship between penetration gas flow rate and purge ratio.

Figure 9. Relationship between penetration gas flow rate and purge ratio.

Figure 10. Relationship between moisture recovery ratio and purge ratio at (1) 0.6 MPa(G), (2) 0.7 MPa(G), and (3) 0.8 MPa(G).

Figure 10. Relationship between moisture recovery ratio and purge ratio at (1) 0.6 MPa(G), (2) 0.7 MPa(G), and (3) 0.8 MPa(G).

Figure 11. Dependency of product gas dew point on inlet moisture concentration.

Figure 11. Dependency of product gas dew point on inlet moisture concentration.

Figure 12. Axial distribution of moisture concentration inside and outside a hollow-fiber membrane module at 0.8 MPa(G).

Figure 12. Axial distribution of moisture concentration inside and outside a hollow-fiber membrane module at 0.8 MPa(G).

Figure 13. Design and flow of detritiation system for the LHD.

Figure 13. Design and flow of detritiation system for the LHD.

Table 2. Design conditions.

Table 3. Design specifications for the system with the membrane module.

Table 4. Design specifications for the system with the MS adsorption column.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.