771
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Sorption behavior of hydroselenide (HSe) onto iron-containing minerals

, &
Pages 305-322 | Received 19 Jul 2013, Accepted 03 Nov 2013, Published online: 04 Dec 2013

Figures & data

Table 1. Experimental variables and data for Se(IV) sorption on goethite.

Table 2. Experimental variables and data for Se(IV) sorption on ferrous oxide.

Table 3. Experimental variables and data for Se(IV) sorption on magnetite.

Table 4. Experimental variables and data for Se(IV) sorption on biotite.

Figure 1. Comparison of Kd values for Se(IV) obtained in this study (open marks) and previously reported ones (closed marks) for (a) goethite [Citation3,Citation12,Citation13,Citation15], (b) ferrous oxide, (c) magnetite [Citation21,Citation27], and (d) biotite [Citation3]. “0.01 M” represents the 0.01 mol dm−3 NaCl concentration. The previous data for ferrous oxide are not available.

Figure 1. Comparison of Kd values for Se(IV) obtained in this study (open marks) and previously reported ones (closed marks) for (a) goethite [Citation3,Citation12,Citation13,Citation15], (b) ferrous oxide, (c) magnetite [Citation21,Citation27], and (d) biotite [Citation3]. “0.01 M” represents the 0.01 mol dm−3 NaCl concentration. The previous data for ferrous oxide are not available.

Figure 2. Experimental conditions of equilibrated solutions in a pH–Eh diagram for the H–O–Se system under standard conditions. The total concentration of Se is 10−8 mol dm−3. The circles, squares, triangles, and asterisks represent the conditions for the sorption experiments using goethite, ferrous oxide, magnetite, and biotite, respectively.

Figure 2. Experimental conditions of equilibrated solutions in a pH–Eh diagram for the H–O–Se system under standard conditions. The total concentration of Se is 10−8 mol dm−3. The circles, squares, triangles, and asterisks represent the conditions for the sorption experiments using goethite, ferrous oxide, magnetite, and biotite, respectively.

Table 5. Experimental variables and data for Se(−II) sorption on goethite (using 0.1 g of the solid phase).

Table 6. Experimental variables and data for Se(−II) sorption on goethite (using 1 g of the solid phase).

Table 7. Experimental variables and data for Se(−II) sorption on ferrous oxide.

Table 8. Experimental variables and data for Se(−II) sorption on magnetite.

Table 9. Experimental variables and data for Se(−II) sorption on biotite.

Figure 3. The Kd values for Se(−II) obtained in this study: (a) goethite, (b) ferrous oxide, (c) magnetite, and (d) biotite. Open marks and closed marks represent the data obtained using 1 g and 0.1 g of the solid phase, respectively.

Figure 3. The Kd values for Se(−II) obtained in this study: (a) goethite, (b) ferrous oxide, (c) magnetite, and (d) biotite. Open marks and closed marks represent the data obtained using 1 g and 0.1 g of the solid phase, respectively.

Figure 4. Schematic drawing of the triple-layer model.

Figure 4. Schematic drawing of the triple-layer model.

Figure 5. Comparison of Rs values of Se(IV) predicted using the TLM (lines) with experimentally measured ones (marks): (a) goethite, (b) ferrous oxide, (c) magnetite, (d) biotite (calculated with KintSeO3 = 1015.1), and (e) biotite (calculated with KintSeO3 = 1016.1).

Figure 5. Comparison of Rs values of Se(IV) predicted using the TLM (lines) with experimentally measured ones (marks): (a) goethite, (b) ferrous oxide, (c) magnetite, (d) biotite (calculated with KintSeO3 = 1015.1), and (e) biotite (calculated with KintSeO3 = 1016.1).

Figure 6. Comparison of Rs values of Se(−II) predicted using the TLM (lines) with experimentally measured ones (marks): (a) goethite (using 0.1 g of the solid phase; assuming inner-sphere complexation), (b) goethite (0.1 g of the solid phase; outer-sphere complexation), (c) goethite (1 g of the solid phase; inner-sphere complexation), (d) goethite (1 g of the solid phase; outer-sphere complexation), (e) ferrous oxide (inner-sphere complexation), and (f) ferrous oxide (outer-sphere complexation).

Figure 6. Comparison of Rs values of Se(−II) predicted using the TLM (lines) with experimentally measured ones (marks): (a) goethite (using 0.1 g of the solid phase; assuming inner-sphere complexation), (b) goethite (0.1 g of the solid phase; outer-sphere complexation), (c) goethite (1 g of the solid phase; inner-sphere complexation), (d) goethite (1 g of the solid phase; outer-sphere complexation), (e) ferrous oxide (inner-sphere complexation), and (f) ferrous oxide (outer-sphere complexation).

Figure 7. Comparison of Rs values of Se(−II) predicted using the TLM (lines) with experimentally measured ones (marks): (a) magnetite (assuming inner-sphere complexation), (b) magnetite (outer-sphere complexation), (c) biotite (inner-sphere complexation), and (d) biotite (outer-sphere complexation).

Figure 7. Comparison of Rs values of Se(−II) predicted using the TLM (lines) with experimentally measured ones (marks): (a) magnetite (assuming inner-sphere complexation), (b) magnetite (outer-sphere complexation), (c) biotite (inner-sphere complexation), and (d) biotite (outer-sphere complexation).

Table 10. Model parameters and equilibrium constants for the TLM calculation.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.