574
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Performance evaluation of a resonance ionization mass spectrometer developed for the FFDL system of fast reactors

, , &
Pages 465-475 | Received 30 Apr 2013, Accepted 09 Dec 2013, Published online: 07 Jan 2014

Figures & data

Figure 1. Gas tagging method employed in the prototype fast breeder reactor Monju. This figure is a modified form of a figure in [Citation1].

Figure 1. Gas tagging method employed in the prototype fast breeder reactor Monju. This figure is a modified form of a figure in [Citation1].

Figure 2. Resonance ionization schemes of Kr and Xe used in this study.

Figure 2. Resonance ionization schemes of Kr and Xe used in this study.

Figure 3. Nuclear reactions involving the tag gas nuclides during fuel burnup.

Figure 3. Nuclear reactions involving the tag gas nuclides during fuel burnup.

Table 1. Definitions of terms used in time-dependent differential equations (1)–(5).

Figure 4. Simulated distributions of measured 78Kr/80Kr isotope ratios for initial ratios of 0.20 and 0.25. See text for the simulation conditions.

Figure 4. Simulated distributions of measured 78Kr/80Kr isotope ratios for initial ratios of 0.20 and 0.25. See text for the simulation conditions.

Figure 5. Simulated distributions of measured 126Xe/129Xe isotope ratios for initial ratios of 0.020 and 0.025. See text for the simulation conditions.

Figure 5. Simulated distributions of measured 126Xe/129Xe isotope ratios for initial ratios of 0.020 and 0.025. See text for the simulation conditions.

Figure 6. Simulated distributions of measured 82Kr/80Kr isotope ratios for initial ratios of 5.0 and 9.0. See text for the simulation conditions.

Figure 6. Simulated distributions of measured 82Kr/80Kr isotope ratios for initial ratios of 5.0 and 9.0. See text for the simulation conditions.

Figure 7. Effects of fuel burnup on simulated distributions of measured 82Kr/80Kr isotope ratios. See text for the simulation conditions.

Figure 7. Effects of fuel burnup on simulated distributions of measured 82Kr/80Kr isotope ratios. See text for the simulation conditions.

Figure 8. Overview of the experimental set-up. This figure is a modified version of an earlier figure appearing in [Citation2].

Figure 8. Overview of the experimental set-up. This figure is a modified version of an earlier figure appearing in [Citation2].

Figure 9. Example of the noise subtraction procedure.

Figure 9. Example of the noise subtraction procedure.

Figure 10. Correction of systematic errors caused by isotope shifts.

Figure 10. Correction of systematic errors caused by isotope shifts.

Figure 11. Evaluation of statistical errors in 78Kr/80Kr and 126Xe/129Xe as functions of measurement time.

Figure 11. Evaluation of statistical errors in 78Kr/80Kr and 126Xe/129Xe as functions of measurement time.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.