482
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Self-leveling behavior of mixed solid particles in cylindrical bed using gas-injection method

, , , , , & show all
Pages 111-122 | Received 10 Jun 2018, Accepted 28 Sep 2018, Published online: 20 Oct 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. Illustration of self-leveling behavior.

Figure 1. Illustration of self-leveling behavior.

Figure 2. Schematic diagram of experimental setup for self-leveling experiments.

Figure 2. Schematic diagram of experimental setup for self-leveling experiments.

Figure 3. Definition of measured bed mound height.

Figure 3. Definition of measured bed mound height.

Figure 4. Observed self-leveling behavior of binary-mixed particle bed (Al2O3 (25%) and SS (75%) particles, dp = 2 mm, Qg ~ 50 L/min, V = 7.0 L, D = 0.31 m).

Figure 4. Observed self-leveling behavior of binary-mixed particle bed (Al2O3 (25%) and SS (75%) particles, dp = 2 mm, Qg ~ 50 L/min, V = 7.0 L, D = 0.31 m).

Table 1. Physical properties of particles

Figure 5. Comparison of bed mound variation between intermittent and continuous gas-injection methods (Qg ~ 46 L/min, V = 7.0 L, D = 0.21 m).

Figure 5. Comparison of bed mound variation between intermittent and continuous gas-injection methods (Qg ~ 46 L/min, V = 7.0 L, D = 0.21 m).

Figure 6. Effect of cylindrical bed diameter on mound height variation (V = 7.0 L).

Figure 6. Effect of cylindrical bed diameter on mound height variation (V = 7.0 L).

Figure 7. Effect of particle volume on mound height variation (D = 0.21 m).

Figure 7. Effect of particle volume on mound height variation (D = 0.21 m).

Figure 8. Effect of mixing ratio on mound height variation in various particle mixtures (V = 7.0 L, D = 0.31 m).

Figure 8. Effect of mixing ratio on mound height variation in various particle mixtures (V = 7.0 L, D = 0.31 m).

Table 2. Experimental cases used to determine model parameters

Figure 9. Comparison of model parameters between experiments and predictions.

Figure 9. Comparison of model parameters between experiments and predictions.

Figure 10. Comparison of mound height between experiments and empirical model.

Figure 10. Comparison of mound height between experiments and empirical model.

Figure 11. Effect of mixing ratio on transient mound height of various binary particle mixtures (V = 7.0 L, D = 0.31 m).

Figure 11. Effect of mixing ratio on transient mound height of various binary particle mixtures (V = 7.0 L, D = 0.31 m).

Figure 12. Self-leveling behavior of ternary mixture (spherical SS particles with dp = 2.00, 4.00, and 6.00 mm; V = 7.0 L; D = 0.31 m).

Figure 12. Self-leveling behavior of ternary mixture (spherical SS particles with dp = 2.00, 4.00, and 6.00 mm; V = 7.0 L; D = 0.31 m).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.